1989
DOI: 10.1039/f19898501009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of group dipole moments from surface potential measurements on Langmuir monolayers

Abstract: Pressure-area isotherms and surface potential data are presented for octadecyl methyl sulphoxide (OMS) and ( + )-octadecyl p-tolyl sulphoxide (OTS). The surface potential measurements indicate very clearly that both compounds are anchored at the water surface by the SO group and that the plateau in the pressure-area isotherm of OTS is the result of significant molecular orientation. The Demchak and Fort model for relating group dipole moments to the surface potential of floating Langmuir monolayers is reviewed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
81
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
11
81
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The ε 2 value for the head groups lies between 3.9 and 5 for the different amphiphiles in this study. These values agree reasonably well with previously reported values [26]. However, for the -OCH 3 -substituted amphiphiles the value is almost around 16, and such a high value should lead to a large polarity, which is indicated by the measured γ p S values of the compound.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The ε 2 value for the head groups lies between 3.9 and 5 for the different amphiphiles in this study. These values agree reasonably well with previously reported values [26]. However, for the -OCH 3 -substituted amphiphiles the value is almost around 16, and such a high value should lead to a large polarity, which is indicated by the measured γ p S values of the compound.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…According to the Demchak-Fort model [20], µ ⊥ is composed of three independent contributions arising from (i) orientation of water dipoles in the vicinity of the headgroups, (ii) the headgroup dipoles, and (iii) the hydrophobic part dipoles. Moreover, in our calculations we assumed, as it is made customary [19,21], that ε r = 1, although it is known that dipoles in a monolayer may be embedded in media with distinct, nonunity dielectric constant values, which depends on whether these dipoles are at the monolayer-water or monolayer-air interface [22,23].…”
Section: Table IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition the monolayers of the pure zwitterionic components have also positive surface potential. This fact was also observed in zwitterionic insoluble monolayers [33], and is due to the contribution of the tail group moments [34,35].…”
Section: Surface Potential Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 62%