2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of in-plane shear capacity of confined masonry walls with and without openings using strut-and-tie analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Tripathy and Singhal (2019) [6] performed a parametric analysis based on a large set of finite element models, intended to realize the behaviour of the masonry strut and to develop a formulation for the strut-and-tie model in CM walls. The work presented here is also based on a parametric numerical study, but it intends to go further in discussing the parameters for a lateral forcedisplacement backbone model.…”
Section: Background Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Tripathy and Singhal (2019) [6] performed a parametric analysis based on a large set of finite element models, intended to realize the behaviour of the masonry strut and to develop a formulation for the strut-and-tie model in CM walls. The work presented here is also based on a parametric numerical study, but it intends to go further in discussing the parameters for a lateral forcedisplacement backbone model.…”
Section: Background Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45,46 Nevertheless, several countries experienced that confined masonry (CM), which is characterized by bearing masonry panels framed by small reinforced concrete horizontal and vertical elements (tie-beams and tie-columns), has improved seismic performance with higher lateral resistance and overall ductility. [47][48][49][50][51][52][53] CM structures have shown a very satisfactory behavior during moderate and strong earthquakes, 54,55 representing a sound alternative to bare and masonry-infilled reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings. 56 Recently, the last of these authors started a research program aimed to assess and improve the dynamic performance of masonry structures by using the CM technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that unreinforced masonry (URM) does not perform well with horizontal loading, such as earthquakes, mainly because of the low tensile strength of bricks and mortar, which causes brittle failure 45,46 . Nevertheless, several countries experienced that confined masonry (CM), which is characterized by bearing masonry panels framed by small reinforced concrete horizontal and vertical elements (tie‐beams and tie‐columns), has improved seismic performance with higher lateral resistance and overall ductility 47–53 . CM structures have shown a very satisfactory behavior during moderate and strong earthquakes, 54,55 representing a sound alternative to bare and masonry‐infilled reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings 56 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strut & Tie (S-T) models are commonly used for the analysis of confined walls subject to seismic results [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Such models can be, however, used to analyse monotonically loaded walls [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%