2020
DOI: 10.3390/jmse8120993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Irregular Wave Runup on Intermediate and Reflective Beaches Using a Phase-Resolving Numerical Model

Abstract: Accurate wave runup estimations are of great interest for coastal risk assessment and engineering design. Phase-resolving depth-integrated numerical models offer a promising alternative to commonly used empirical formulae at relatively low computational cost. Several operational models are currently freely available and have been extensively used in recent years for the computation of nearshore wave transformations and runup. However, recommendations for best practices on how to correctly utilize these models … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, friction is shown to have a major influence on improving average model performance (Conde‐Frias et al., 2017), with higher Manning coefficients reducing modeled R 2% . Although the default value for the run‐up gauge depth is 0.005 m, a larger value of 0.1 m has been fixed during calibration, consistently with other studies (Fiedler et al., 2015; Pinault et al., 2020; Stockdon et al., 2014) which used the same value to extract run‐up from lidar timestacks and numerically modeled swash.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…As expected, friction is shown to have a major influence on improving average model performance (Conde‐Frias et al., 2017), with higher Manning coefficients reducing modeled R 2% . Although the default value for the run‐up gauge depth is 0.005 m, a larger value of 0.1 m has been fixed during calibration, consistently with other studies (Fiedler et al., 2015; Pinault et al., 2020; Stockdon et al., 2014) which used the same value to extract run‐up from lidar timestacks and numerically modeled swash.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The BOSZ model is a self‐contained collection of subroutines for modeling free surface flows, surf, and swash‐zone dynamics (Roeber & Cheung, 2012). The model accuracy has been validated extensively using laboratory benchmarking tests (Lashley et al., 2020; Pinault et al., 2020; Roeber & Cheung, 2012; Roeber et al., 2010). The BOSZ model can successfully reproduce extreme IGs generated by storm waves, such as those reported during 2013 Typhoon Haiyan (Roeber & Bricker, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BOSZ model is a self‐contained collection of subroutines for modeling free surface flows, surf, and swash‐zone dynamics (Roeber & Cheung, 2012). The model accuracy has been validated extensively using laboratory benchmarking tests (Lashley et al., 2020; Roeber & Cheung, 2012; Roeber et al., 2010; Pinault et al., 2020). The BOSZ model is able to successfully reproduce extreme infragravity waves generated by storm waves such as reported during the 2013 Typhoon Haiyan (Roeber & Bricker, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%