2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2021.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Lead Exposure Intensity by Industry Using Nationwide Exposure Databases in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we estimated the exposure intensity of 21 carcinogenic agents across 228 minor industries using a nationwide exposure measurement database using a previously tested intensity indicator for exposure intensity development [ 22 ]. The results will provide information on the exposure intensity of carcinogens as a complement to the previously developed K-CAREX [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, we estimated the exposure intensity of 21 carcinogenic agents across 228 minor industries using a nationwide exposure measurement database using a previously tested intensity indicator for exposure intensity development [ 22 ]. The results will provide information on the exposure intensity of carcinogens as a complement to the previously developed K-CAREX [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study, we calculated the summary statistics of airborne lead measurements and compared them with those from blood lead data [ 22 ]. The results indicated that X95 is likely to be an optimal indicator when restricting results to industries containing ≥20 measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Each KOSHA-licensed institute and hospital might have their own limit of detection (LOD) of BLL, but the information is not available [26]. The LOD of BLL was estimated at 0.85 µg/dL [26][27][28] and all results <0.85 µg/dL or reported as "not detected" in lead exposed workers were substituted using the equation √ 1/3 × 0.85 [27]. In each cohort, members' BLLs varied from one to five, depending on how many times the worker underwent the ASME, including lead, during this period.…”
Section: Analysis Of Blood Lead Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%