2015
DOI: 10.1080/1064119x.2013.806973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Manganese Nodule Coverage Using Multi-Beam Amplitude Data

Abstract: Manganese nodule coverage is estimated based on multi-beam and deep-towed video nodule survey profiles of about 1,700 km in the China Pioneer Area of Eastern Pacific. Two statistical equations for estimating nodule coverage are derived separately from the multi-beam normal incidence amplitude data and angular amplitude data based on theoretical analysis of influence factors on multi-beam amplitude data. Predictions generated by the normal incidence amplitude model fall within 5% of real nodule coverage, and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we commonly observed correlations between the backscatter intensity and the nodule distribution density (Figures S7-S28, supplementary material) at all dive sites in the entire dataset region, even outside the type location (will be discussed in detail in the following section). These observations are consistent with previous theoretical investigations (Chunhui et al 2015). An exception to these consistencies was observed at site 6 K#1460 (Figures S10 and S11; Table S1, supplementary material) caused by a cover of thin pelagic sediment on a dense ferromanganese nodule field.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, we commonly observed correlations between the backscatter intensity and the nodule distribution density (Figures S7-S28, supplementary material) at all dive sites in the entire dataset region, even outside the type location (will be discussed in detail in the following section). These observations are consistent with previous theoretical investigations (Chunhui et al 2015). An exception to these consistencies was observed at site 6 K#1460 (Figures S10 and S11; Table S1, supplementary material) caused by a cover of thin pelagic sediment on a dense ferromanganese nodule field.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Indeed, certain applications using a deep-towed side scan sonar (Lee and Kim 2004;Wiedicke and Weber 1996) demonstrate highresolution mapping results for nodule fields at once only covering an area of several hundreds of square metres. In contrast, some previous investigations using vessel-equipped MBES identified variations of distributions over an area of tens or hundreds of square kilometres of lava (Hirano et al 2006(Hirano et al , 2013(Hirano et al , 2016 or nodules (Chakraborty and Kodagali 2004;Chunhui et al 2015;Machida et al 2016) based on backscatter intensity levels. Therefore, vesselequipped MBES can provide a more economical exploration for vast areas than that provided by underwater apparatuses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The wide swath of MBES means that its potential use in geological interpretation and mineral resource estimation is attractive. COMRA ( [38]) used acoustic response in their Multi-Frequency Exploration System (MFES), which was refined by Tao et al [56]. Knobloch et al [57] included MBES response in their combined artificial neural network and geostatistical mineral resource estimation, and Wong et al [58] observed >85% average accuracy for their study area, using a combination of bathymetry and backscatter processed through an artificial neural network.…”
Section: Geology Of Polymetallic Nodule Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation of seafloor nodule coverage on the seafloor photographs is based on manual or automatic (using computer software) contouring of nodules. Multi-beam data [6] were also used for this purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%