2016
DOI: 10.5572/kosae.2016.32.2.193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Mercury Emission from Major Sources in Annex D of Minamata Convention and Future Trend

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three mountains are in proximity to coal-fired power plants. 29 Mt Bihak and Mt Hambaek are located on the east coast and are situated <20 km away from steel manufacturing plants and cement clinker production facilities. Mt Jiri is located inland and is a relatively remote site, given that anthropogenic Hg emission sources are situated >50 km away from this region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three mountains are in proximity to coal-fired power plants. 29 Mt Bihak and Mt Hambaek are located on the east coast and are situated <20 km away from steel manufacturing plants and cement clinker production facilities. Mt Jiri is located inland and is a relatively remote site, given that anthropogenic Hg emission sources are situated >50 km away from this region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropogenic mercury emission facility means that mercury emits from the process, although mercury was not used in the raw material. Among the facilities falling under Annex D, the main emission facilities are coal-fired power plants, primary smelting facilities for non-ferrous metals, cement clinker production facilities, and waste incineration facilities [4]. In the case of mercury compounds emitted from anthropogenic emission sources, there is elemental mercury (Hg 0 ) and oxidized mercury (Hg 2+ ) in the atmosphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%