2001
DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.kj00001357640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Patient Dose by Using a Digital Imaging System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several methods for estimating the exposure dose with indices relating to the PSL value have been reported. [11][12][13][14][15] Tatsumi et al 11 reported on the dependency of the S number for exposure doses ranging from 0.13 to 1.3 C kg −1 ͑0.5 to 5 mR͒ and the tube voltage from 40 to 120 kV. Chu et al 12 showed how the S number decreased when the tube voltage was increased in a range between 50 and 90 kVp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several methods for estimating the exposure dose with indices relating to the PSL value have been reported. [11][12][13][14][15] Tatsumi et al 11 reported on the dependency of the S number for exposure doses ranging from 0.13 to 1.3 C kg −1 ͑0.5 to 5 mR͒ and the tube voltage from 40 to 120 kV. Chu et al 12 showed how the S number decreased when the tube voltage was increased in a range between 50 and 90 kVp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shiraishi et al 13 estimated the entrance surface doses of 182 patients by using the PSL value per pixel. The doses ranging from 0.8 to 25 C kg −1 ͑from 0.03 to 0.9 mGy͒ were determined within an uncertainty of ±40%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%