2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of porosity from seismic attributes using a committee model with bat-inspired optimization algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most important tools for reservoir evaluation and description of reservoir parameters is well log data . Information such as porosity, p-wave velocity, shale volume, water saturation, permeability, lithology, and production zones can be obtained from the processing and interpretation of well logs (Gholami and Ansari 2017). Although this type of data has higher resolution than seismic data, it relates to a small part of the reservoir or the well environment, and considering the complexities of the geology, errors will occur in generalizing the data to the whole reservoir (Somasundaram et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important tools for reservoir evaluation and description of reservoir parameters is well log data . Information such as porosity, p-wave velocity, shale volume, water saturation, permeability, lithology, and production zones can be obtained from the processing and interpretation of well logs (Gholami and Ansari 2017). Although this type of data has higher resolution than seismic data, it relates to a small part of the reservoir or the well environment, and considering the complexities of the geology, errors will occur in generalizing the data to the whole reservoir (Somasundaram et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, machine learning and deep learning methods have been utilized in the seismic domain for different tasks such as inversion and interpretation (AlRegib et al, 2018). For example, seismic inversion has been attempted using supervised-learning algorithms such as support vector regression (SVR) (Al-Anazi and Gates, 2012), artificial neural networks (Röth and Tarantola, 1994;Araya-Polo et al, 2018), committee models (Gholami and Ansari, 2017), convolutional neural networks (CNNs) (Das et al, 2018), and many other methods (Chaki et al, 2015;Yuan and Wang, 2013;Gholami and Ansari, 2017;Chaki et al, 2017;Mosser et al, 2018;Chaki et al, 2018). More recently, a sequencemodeling-based machine learning workflow was used to estimate petrophysical properties from seismic data (Alfarraj and AlRegib, 2018), which showed that recurrent neural networks are superior to feed-forward neural networks in capturing the temporal dynamics of seismic traces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several attempts have been made using machine learning and statistical learning tools such as artificial neural networks, and support vector regression to solve the RC problem [2][3][4][5]. The literature shows great promise for machine learning algorithms for property estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%