The most commonly used data for reservoir description are well and seismic data. Well data such as logs typically provide sufficient vertical resolution but leave a large space between the wells. Three-dimensional seismic data, on the other hand, can provide more detailed reservoir characterization between wells. However, the vertical resolution of seismic data is poor compared with that of well data. Conventionally, seismic data have been used to delineate reservoir structure; however, seismic data can be used for reservoir characterization such as porosity. Therefore, we can combine these two types of data to obtain reservoir parameters such as porosity and saturation. It is available the desired parameter (such as porosity) of the number of wells in the reservoir and seismic cube. And we are looking for the parameter estimation in the whole reservoir. To do this, there are several methods including multiple linear regression, neural networks, and geostatistical methods. Therefore, by determining the reservoir properties and correctly estimating these parameters, optimization can be performed with fewer wells, and the costs of exploration and production are reduced. In this paper, we apply these methods on the available data for an oil field in southwest Iran to obtain the porosity in a total reservoir cube, and these methods are then compared with one another. The results clearly show the superiority of neural networks compared with the other methods in estimating the reservoir parameter. The results also show that although estimation accuracy is increased significantly with the use of the geostatistical approach, this method requires that a sufficient number of well logs, representing all the fields under investigation, be provided in order to improve the geological model obtained by the multi-attribute and neural network methods.