2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69895-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of potential global pandemic influenza mortality on the basis of vital registry data from the 1918–20 pandemic: a quantitative analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
556
3
31

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 526 publications
(619 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
29
556
3
31
Order By: Relevance
“…The deadly nature of the H1N1 virus that caused the pandemic, the unique epidemiological features of the pandemic, and the pathophysiology of deaths caused by this virus set this pandemic apart from its successors and its predecessors alike (1). Although there is evidence of substantial geographic variation in mortality rates across countries (2) and even within cities (3), studies of the 1918 pandemic in the United States (4,5), the United Kingdom (6, 7), Europe (8), South America (9-11), and Asia (12,13) focus mainly on differences in onset of the pandemic, age-specific mortality, and transmission of the virus across large geographic regions. Few studies have explored the effects of sociodemographic factors on differential mortality during the 1918 pandemic, despite the known impacts of social inequalities on disease progression and outcomes through decreased access to healthcare, overcrowding, comorbidities associated with lower resources, lower nutritional status, and a poor understanding of control measures because of lack of education (14)(15)(16)(17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deadly nature of the H1N1 virus that caused the pandemic, the unique epidemiological features of the pandemic, and the pathophysiology of deaths caused by this virus set this pandemic apart from its successors and its predecessors alike (1). Although there is evidence of substantial geographic variation in mortality rates across countries (2) and even within cities (3), studies of the 1918 pandemic in the United States (4,5), the United Kingdom (6, 7), Europe (8), South America (9-11), and Asia (12,13) focus mainly on differences in onset of the pandemic, age-specific mortality, and transmission of the virus across large geographic regions. Few studies have explored the effects of sociodemographic factors on differential mortality during the 1918 pandemic, despite the known impacts of social inequalities on disease progression and outcomes through decreased access to healthcare, overcrowding, comorbidities associated with lower resources, lower nutritional status, and a poor understanding of control measures because of lack of education (14)(15)(16)(17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nations with manufacturing facilities distributed vaccines domestically before exporting them; some wealthy nations without vaccine-manufacturing capacity paid substantial sums to reserve the remaining supply. Meanwhile, robust modelling studies indicated that more than 90% of the deaths from a potential influenza pandemic would probably occur in the world's poorest countries 8 .…”
Section: More Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although numerous epidemics with significant morbidity and mortality occurred from the 16 th century it is generally agreed that the first recorded outbreak meeting pandemic criteria is that of Mortality varied across countries with sparing attributed to affluence 15 and delayed introduction achieved by maritime quarantine 16 . Australia, where introduction was delayed until March 1919, had one of the lowest mortality rates, particularly in Tasmania 16 .…”
Section: Early History Of Influenzamentioning
confidence: 99%