2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12562-012-0488-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency changes in the Korean offshore fisheries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ritzau et al (2014) estimate that catchability increases by 3.2% per year due to technological developments. Kim et al (2012) estimate an average 6% drop in the total factor productivity of 12 Korean offshore fisheries over the 1997-2009 period, the change ranging from a 16.6% drop of the trawl fishery and a 4.8% increase of the long line fishery. 13 See Wilberg et al (2009) for a survey of the use of a time-varying catchability parameter.…”
Section: Data and Measurement Of Effortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ritzau et al (2014) estimate that catchability increases by 3.2% per year due to technological developments. Kim et al (2012) estimate an average 6% drop in the total factor productivity of 12 Korean offshore fisheries over the 1997-2009 period, the change ranging from a 16.6% drop of the trawl fishery and a 4.8% increase of the long line fishery. 13 See Wilberg et al (2009) for a survey of the use of a time-varying catchability parameter.…”
Section: Data and Measurement Of Effortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the latest data of fish stock of demersal fish in west coast could not be obtain since the last survey made by DOF was around 1997-1998. Hence, the alternative way did by Kim et al (2012), Haggarty and King (2006), Pascoe et al (2004), which they used catch per unit of effort, CPUE as symbolizing the biodynamics of fish stocks affecting the fish landings. This CPUE refers to the total catch per effort expended to catch fish using the existing assets or energy (i.e., vessels, fishing period, engine size etc.).…”
Section: Determination Of Inputs and Outputsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research on the development of fishery science and technology mainly involved the measurement of total factor productivity, the calculation of economic contribution rate and the calculation of technological innovation efficiency. Wang et al [13] explored the impact of fishery science and technology development on improving fishery total factor productivity by using econometric model, and proposed to adjust the direction and focus of fishery science and technology transformation; Yu et al [14] used the Cobb Douglas production function and the solo residual method to calculated the contribution rate of fishery scientific and technological progress to fishery economy; Kim et al [15] constructed the Malmquist productivity index to estimate the changes of productivity growth and technological progress of offshore fisheries in South Korea in total factor productivity; Apreku et al [16] combined Nerlovian and directional distance function methods to decompose the profit efficiency of fishery into technical efficiency and distribution efficiency, and explored the contribution of profit efficiency to fishery production; Zheng et al [17] measured the total factor productivity of fishery economy in Chinese mainland and Taiwan coastal areas, and pointed out that the improvement in technological innovation efficiency and technological progress would promote the total factor productivity of fisheries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%