2014
DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Random-Coefficient Demand Models: Two Empiricists' Perspective

Abstract: We document the numerical challenges we experienced estimating random-coefficient demand models as in Berry, Levinsohn, and Pakes (1995) using two well-known data sets and a thorough optimization design. The optimization algorithms often converge at points where the first-and second-order optimality conditions fail. There are also cases of convergence at local optima. On convergence, the variation in the values of the parameter estimates translates into variation in the models' economic predictions. Price elas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
74
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the weighting matrix Φ is a consistent estimate of E[Z ξ(θ)ξ(θ) Z], and is obtained employing the usual two-stage procedure (see Nevo 2000 for more details). Finally, as noted by Knittel and Metaxoglou (2014), the estimation procedure is subject to variability depending on the optimization algorithms and initial values considered. Similarly, Dube et al (2012) note the dangers of using loose tolerance levels in the estimation procedure.…”
Section: Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the weighting matrix Φ is a consistent estimate of E[Z ξ(θ)ξ(θ) Z], and is obtained employing the usual two-stage procedure (see Nevo 2000 for more details). Finally, as noted by Knittel and Metaxoglou (2014), the estimation procedure is subject to variability depending on the optimization algorithms and initial values considered. Similarly, Dube et al (2012) note the dangers of using loose tolerance levels in the estimation procedure.…”
Section: Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work complements some recent papers in which alternative estimation approaches and extensions of the standard random coefficients logit model have been proposed, including Villas-Boas and Winer (1999), Knittel and Metaxoglou (2014), Dube et al (2012), Harding and Hausman (2007), Bajari et al (2011), and Gandhi et al (2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Our work complements some recent papers in which alternative estimation approaches and extensions of the standard random coefficients logit model have been proposed, including Villas-Boas and Winer (1999), Knittel and Metaxoglou (2014), Dube, Fox and Su (2012), Harding and Hausman (2007), Bajari, Fox, Kim and Ryan (2011), and Gandhi, Kim and Petrin (2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%