2013
DOI: 10.2116/analsci.29.377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Relative Reaction Rate of Hydroxy Radical with Poly-hydroxy Benzenes: ESR Spin Trapping Combined with UV-A Photolysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we report on the development of a novel method to detect CIs from terpenes and other large alkenes in the gas phase by reaction and stabilization with spin traps, molecules widely applied for detection of free radicals in solutions with electron paramagnetic resonance, and quantification with proton-transfer reaction mass spectrometry. The method proposed here is suitable for online quantification of CIs in the gas phase and allows for the unambiguous identification of CI-spin trap adducts in complex organic mixtures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we report on the development of a novel method to detect CIs from terpenes and other large alkenes in the gas phase by reaction and stabilization with spin traps, molecules widely applied for detection of free radicals in solutions with electron paramagnetic resonance, and quantification with proton-transfer reaction mass spectrometry. The method proposed here is suitable for online quantification of CIs in the gas phase and allows for the unambiguous identification of CI-spin trap adducts in complex organic mixtures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the reaction rate constants for the target ROS vs the spin-trapping agent ( k 1 ), the concentration of the spin-trapping agent ([Spin-Trap]) and the value of IC 50 ([IC 50 ]), the reaction rate constant for the target ROS vs the scavengers ( k 2 ) can be approximated as shown in Equation 1. ( 32 ) The value of k 1 (O 2 •− vs DMPO) has been reported as 10 M −1 s −1 , ( 24 26 ) and the value of k 2 (O 2 •− vs nanoceria) was calculated. On the other hand, the value of k 1 ( 1 O 2 vs TPC) is unknown.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the reaction rate constants for the target ROS vs the spin-trapping agent (k 1 ), the concentration of the spin-trapping agent ([Spin-Trap]) and the value of IC 50 ([IC 50 ]), the reaction rate constant for the target ROS vs the scavengers (k 2 ) can be approximated as shown in Equation 1. (32) The value of k 1 (O 2…”
Section: Monitoring Of O 2 Produced By Catalase-mimic Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%