2011
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of remaining dentine thickness below deep lesions of caries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to Jesse et al 28 and Kooistra et al, 29 we consider the measurement of RDT on histological sections to be the reference (gold standard). Nonetheless, our results differ from theirs and from the results of other authors, such as Lancaster et al 7 However, they corroborate those of Mejare and Kidd, 30 who found an overestimation of the depth of the lesion on the radiograph, which is due to the projection of the periphery of the carious lesion on the bottom of the latter.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to Jesse et al 28 and Kooistra et al, 29 we consider the measurement of RDT on histological sections to be the reference (gold standard). Nonetheless, our results differ from theirs and from the results of other authors, such as Lancaster et al 7 However, they corroborate those of Mejare and Kidd, 30 who found an overestimation of the depth of the lesion on the radiograph, which is due to the projection of the periphery of the carious lesion on the bottom of the latter.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“… 33 Moreover, this meets the principle of “stepwise excavation” that is currently widely accepted in the restoration of deep carious lesions and is performed since many years, on primary teeth 34 ; one of the main objectives of our study was to assess the RDT, thus allowing us to establish the most appropriate therapeutic indication. 7 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, dental radiographs seem to exhibit low sensitivity but rather high specificity, whereas the true RDT and extent of caries lesions seem to be underestimated (3,4). SS-OCT showed significantly higher sensitivity and larger area under the receiver operating characteristic curve than radiographs for the characterization of cavitated enamel lesions and dentin caries when compared with bitewing radiographs (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Usually radiographs are taken for the diagnosis and to see the extension of the caries. Radiographs may help to identify either new or recurrent caries but can only roughly assess the remaining dentin thickness (RDT) and pulp horns to avoid the exposure of the vital pulp tissue (3). Moreover, because radiography produces harmful x-rays and superimposition of the structures results in limited diagnostic accuracy, it is not a convenient option at the time of treatment (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%