1996
DOI: 10.1080/07474939608800363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of sample selection bias models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nawata and Nagase (1996), Yu (1996, 2000), Puhani (2000). The advantage of MLE in terms of efficiency is not always confirmed in finite samples: Heckman's procedure may turn to be more efficient than MLE (see Leung and Yu, 2000).…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nawata and Nagase (1996), Yu (1996, 2000), Puhani (2000). The advantage of MLE in terms of efficiency is not always confirmed in finite samples: Heckman's procedure may turn to be more efficient than MLE (see Leung and Yu, 2000).…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For treatment-effects model estimation, we implement a full information maximum likelihood (FIML) approach (Greene, 2003;Nawata and Nagase, 1996), which is more efficient than the Heckman two-step estimator. We use agricultural information constraint and knowledge of a TC nursery as instruments, which are correlated with TC adoption but uncorrelated with all outcome variables.…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, convergence problems usually appear when it is necessary to estimate a large set of parameters (Nawata and Nagase, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%