2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-8853(01)00983-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of single ion anisotropy in pyrochlore Dy2Ti2O7, a geometrically frustrated system, using crystal field theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was confirmed by Flood (1974) from direct measurement of the magnetic moment and from analysis of inelastic neutron scattering data by Rosenkranz (Rosenkranz et al, 2000). Calculations from crystal field theory, complemented by fitting crystal field parameters (CFPs) to susceptibility data also confirmed the strong Ising nature of Dy 3+ in Dy 2 Ti 2 O 7 (Jana et al, 2002). Specifically, the single ion electronic ground state of Dy 3+ is a Kramers doublet of almost pure |J = 15/2, m J = ±15/2 separated from the first excited state by a gap ∆ ≈ 33 meV (∼ 380 K) while the rescaled CFPs of Rosenkranz et al (2000) and Jana et al (2002) finds a much smaller excitation gap ∆ ≈ 100 cm −1 (∼ 140 K).…”
Section: A Dy2ti2o7 and Ho2ti2o7mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This was confirmed by Flood (1974) from direct measurement of the magnetic moment and from analysis of inelastic neutron scattering data by Rosenkranz (Rosenkranz et al, 2000). Calculations from crystal field theory, complemented by fitting crystal field parameters (CFPs) to susceptibility data also confirmed the strong Ising nature of Dy 3+ in Dy 2 Ti 2 O 7 (Jana et al, 2002). Specifically, the single ion electronic ground state of Dy 3+ is a Kramers doublet of almost pure |J = 15/2, m J = ±15/2 separated from the first excited state by a gap ∆ ≈ 33 meV (∼ 380 K) while the rescaled CFPs of Rosenkranz et al (2000) and Jana et al (2002) finds a much smaller excitation gap ∆ ≈ 100 cm −1 (∼ 140 K).…”
Section: A Dy2ti2o7 and Ho2ti2o7mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Here, we use the temperaturerescaled c ph of the non-magnetic Y 2 Ti 2 O 7 and check the reliability of our procedure by measuring the specific heat of all (Dy 1-x Y x ) 2 Ti 2 O 7 samples in B = 0.5 and 1 T applied along the [100] direction. For this direction, field strengths between 0.5 and 1 T are, on the one hand side, sufficient to reach a fully saturated mag-netization at T ≃ 0.5 K. On the other hand, such fields are still low enough to reach the full entropy S ∞ of a two-level system around 25 K, where the thermal population of higher-lying crystal field levels is still negligible [33,34]. Figure 3 summarizes the magnetic entropy of the series (Dy 1-x Y x ) 2 Ti 2 O 7 .…”
Section: Fig 2 (Color Online) (A) Specific Heat C(t ) Per Formula Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). The trigonal crystal field enforces a doublet ground state for each ion [53][54][55][56] and establishes a local Ising-like [56] confinement with effective two-state spins S i pointing between the centers of each pair of adjacent tetrahedra. The associated magnetic moments are very large, µ ≈ 10 µ B , with the consequence that dipole-dipole interactions are particularly strong in these materials.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%