2015
DOI: 10.1002/2014wr016245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of soil salinity in a drip irrigation system by using joint inversion of multicoil electromagnetic induction measurements

Abstract: Low frequency electromagnetic induction (EMI) is becoming a useful tool for soil characterization due to its fast measurement capability and sensitivity to soil moisture and salinity. In this research, a new EMI system (the CMD mini-Explorer) is used for subsurface characterization of soil salinity in a drip irrigation system via a joint inversion approach of multiconfiguration EMI measurements. EMI measurements were conducted across a farm where Acacia trees are irrigated with brackish water. In situ measurem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach by Santos was lately developed further to a quasi-3D approach, but still under the LIN approximation [23]. Other studies have also aimed at deriving the layering of the subsurface while assuming the LIN-approximation [24][25][26]. However, even if the LIN approximation is easy to use and implement, there has been a consistent use of the direct measurement values (typically converted to apparent conductivity or resistivity) as the final product [11,27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach by Santos was lately developed further to a quasi-3D approach, but still under the LIN approximation [23]. Other studies have also aimed at deriving the layering of the subsurface while assuming the LIN-approximation [24][25][26]. However, even if the LIN approximation is easy to use and implement, there has been a consistent use of the direct measurement values (typically converted to apparent conductivity or resistivity) as the final product [11,27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten pits were dug along the same transect and in each pit the bulk electrical conductivity σ b profile was measured at 15 locations within a depth range of 0.05-1.5 m via 5TE capacitance sensors (Decagon Devices, Pullman, USA). EMI and 5TE measurements were performed 8 h after the drip irrigation system was stopped, so that the soil moisture is not concentrated below the drippers and to give enough time to reduce the soil moisture impact due to evaporation, root water uptake, and infiltration (Jadoon et al, 2015). Figure 2a and b depict the observed, estimated (modeled) and range of EC a as they result from the chain of MCMC simulation for six configurations of the synthetic case with saline and non-saline soil.…”
Section: Synthetic and Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, for the six tested configurations of Figure 5. (a) Electrical conductivity (mS m −1 ) measured by the 5TE capacitance sensors from 10 soil pits along transect and the location of the soil pits is indicated by black triangles (Jadoon et al, 2015); (b) the soil electrical conductivity obtained by using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation for multi-configuration electromagnetic induction measurements. CMD Mini-Explorer, the HCP and VCP configuration with spacing 1.18 m are mostly sensitive to the consolidated layer while the remaining four configurations are more sensitive to the upper horizon.…”
Section: Synthetic and Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of EMI is largely motivated by the need of robust and compact system design, easy to use, rapid acquisition, and capability to produce a large number of georeferenced measurements that can be associated with the spatial variability of subsurface at the field scale (Corwin, 2008). Several inversion algorithms have been developed for EMI measurements to improve the resolution of subsurface features and the assessment of soil properties (Hendrickx et al, 2002;Lavoue et al, 2010;Triantafilis and Monteiro Santos, 2013;Jadoon et al, 2015). Generally these inversion algorithms are robust and provide useful estimates of subsurface properties in terms of optimal model parameters, analysis of parameter uncertainty and correlation is often left unaddressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%