2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10182-012-0191-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of spatial processes using local scoring rules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, evaluating (2.2) and computing the SME Q̂ requires no knowledge of the normalization constant, which is eliminated upon taking logarithmic derivatives with respect to x . Besides the imaging problems considered by Hyvärinen (2005), score matching has been applied to spatial statistics (Dawid and Musio, 2013) and neural networks (Köster and Hyvärinen, 2007; Vincent, 2011; Le et al, 2011). …”
Section: Score Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, evaluating (2.2) and computing the SME Q̂ requires no knowledge of the normalization constant, which is eliminated upon taking logarithmic derivatives with respect to x . Besides the imaging problems considered by Hyvärinen (2005), score matching has been applied to spatial statistics (Dawid and Musio, 2013) and neural networks (Köster and Hyvärinen, 2007; Vincent, 2011; Le et al, 2011). …”
Section: Score Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For binary X v and S 0 the Brier score, it leads to the ratio matching method of Hyvärinen (2005). Some comparisons may be found in Dawid & Musio (2013).…”
Section: Composite Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For binary X v , taking S 0 to be the Brier score forms the basis of the ratio matching method of Hyvärinen (2007). Some comparisons can be found in Dawid and Musio (2013).…”
Section: Pseudo Scorementioning
confidence: 99%