2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of stature from handprint dimensions in Egyptian population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
23
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
11
23
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As indicated in Table 1, the highest correlation to stature is hand length for both hand and also for handprint. The populations under study also exhibited that hand and handprint length has the highest correlation to stature in both males and females, similar to previous results in other countries [6], [8], [9]. This proves that the relationship between the two variables of interest does exist and they are in positive correlation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As indicated in Table 1, the highest correlation to stature is hand length for both hand and also for handprint. The populations under study also exhibited that hand and handprint length has the highest correlation to stature in both males and females, similar to previous results in other countries [6], [8], [9]. This proves that the relationship between the two variables of interest does exist and they are in positive correlation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Another impression evidence that is also an important piece of evidence in forensic anthropometry is handprint, where one can obtain information such as height, weight and sex provided by formulae. Several numbers of studies have presented the relation between stature and hand and handprint among different human population utilizing linear and multiple regression analysis [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. The measurements of hand and handprint showed positive correlation with stature and they also found that hand length and handprint length has the strongest correlation and lowest SEE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current research recorded lower SEE in handprints dimensions in females than males (Table 5), this correspond with the values of the coefficient of determination (R2) seen in Table 5 for multiple equations and Graphs 1-8 for simple equations which conforms with the data of Krishan et al [9] among Panjab Medical students in India, the work of Sangeeta et al [11] on Rajasthan population, that of Paulis [13] in an Egyptian population and that of Kornieieva & Elelemi [12] in a Sample of Saudi Population which all reconstructed Stature from Handprints parameters and found contrasting values for Pearson correlation coefficient (r), coefficient of determination (R2) and standard error of estimate (SEE) between stature and handprint parameters which is a pointer that no two populations have the same values for body parameters. These variations further buttress the fact that every region needs a population-specific regression equation for prediction of stature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Generally the female's values consistently showed stronger association with stature than the result of males sample in all the studied variables as seen in Table 3 & 4 which is not in tandem with the report of Ishak et al [3] in a Western Australian population, which record irregular stronger correlation coefficient with stature in males and females. Although bilateral limb asymmetry also influenced the relationship with stature when predicting because different sides of the limbs will correlate differently thereby formulating contrasting equations in one individual which may not give accurate results whenever the results of both side are compared [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В мировой литературе последнего времени утверждается мнение о важности морфометрического изучения следов как источника информации, которая может дополнить показания очевидцев или дать новое направление расследованию [5]. Исследования O. Jasuja и G. Singh [6], M. Paulis [7] показали, что степень погрешности при определении длины тела по размерам следов рук находится в пределах допустимых норм. Вместе с тем существуют явные различия в методах измерений, что вызывает вопросы при попытке их воспроизведения [8].…”
unclassified