INTRODUCTION:Stature of an individual is an inherent characteristic, the estimate of which is considered to be an important assessment in identification of unknown human remains 12 .The stature prediction occupies relatively a central position both in anthropological research and in the identification necessitated by the medical jurisprudence or by medico legal experts. Estimation of stature of an individual from the skeletal material or from the mutilated or amputated limbs or parts of limbs has obvious significance in the personal identification in the events of the murders, accidents or natural disasters mainly concerns with forensic identification analysis 8 . Whether this is true for the North Indian Punjabi male population is not known till date. AIMS: The present study was done with an aim to establish relationship between height and hand length in adult males of north Indian Punjabi population, as it is not seen in the accessible literature till date to the best of our knowledge. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Height of 150 healthy male students between 18 to 25 years of age was measured with the help of an anthropometric rod. The height of all the students was measured in anatomical position keeping all the subjects erect. The height measured was vertical distance from the vertex to floor. Hand length is the direct linear distance between the distal wrist crease and the distal ends of most anterior projecting point i.e., tip of the middle finger. It is also the distance between midpoint of line joining the two stylion and Dactylion of middle finger. Result: -A positive correlation between height and hand length was observed and it was statistically significant. Regression equation for height estimation was formulated using hand length. For statistical analysis IBM (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) SPSS + Version 20 was used. The mean difference of the height was 1773.273 ± 78.832 mm and Hand length (Right and Left) were 196.373 ± 11.515 and 196.267 ± 11.546 mm respectively. CONCLUSION: The height and hand length measurements were statistically significant (p<0.0001). Hand length is a good predictor of height. The correlation between hand length and height (r=0.654; p<0.0001) was high and significant in all the subjects. The findings could also be of practical