Estimation of the autoclave and different surface treatments on microleakage between soft liner and heat-cured acrylic

Abstract

Objective: The present study was oriented to estimate the effect of different surface treatments on the microleakage between the soft liner and acrylic with and without the use of autoclave as disinfection method. Material and Methods: Sixty samples were split into two groups: the autoclaved groups and non-autoclaved groups. Each one subdivided into three groups: first one without any treatments as a control group; in the second group surface of the samples were treated with CO2 laser (10.6 nm wavelength for 15 seconds), and in the third group the surface was treated with sandblasting. All the samples exposed to thermocycling, then the microleakage test was evaluated by gauging dye penetration depth between the soft liner and acrylic disc using a digital microscope. Data analyzed statistically by One-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests. In addition, t-test was used for comparison between two groups . Results: The maximum mean values for the microleakage were observed in the untreated group (control) followed by the group treated by CO2 laser and the lowest mean value of microleakage was related to the third group for both non-autoclaved and autoclaved groups with significant differences among them. In addition, depending on the use of autoclave, there was non-significant in all studied groups. Conclusions: There was a decrease in the microleakage when the surface treated with CO2 laser and sandblast. The use of autoclave did not badly change the microleakage between the soft liner and denture base. Keywords Microleakage; Soft liner; Autoclave; CO2 laser; Sandblast.

Analyzing SHORE A hardness to assess the durability of soft denture lining materials

“…This results in an increase in the material's hardness, along with water absorption, dimensional changes, and stresses on the liner-denture base interface, consequently reducing bond strength. This may cause debonding or microleakage between SDL and the prosthesis, leading to contamination by microorganisms [10,14]. Frequent replacement of the material is necessary to maintain its desired softness and functionality [13].…”