2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11676-014-0437-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the carbon pool in soil and above-ground biomass within mangrove forests in Southeast Mexico using allometric equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The C sequestration rates (mass C m −2 year −1 ) were calculated by multiplying average C concentration by the sediment accumulation rate (mass m −2 year −1 ) in each core (where quantified). Estimates of aboveground biomass per unit area were obtained by drying and weighing aboveground materials for tidal marshes and seagrasses, and using field measurements and allometric equations (specific to the region and species) for mangroves 59,60 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C sequestration rates (mass C m −2 year −1 ) were calculated by multiplying average C concentration by the sediment accumulation rate (mass m −2 year −1 ) in each core (where quantified). Estimates of aboveground biomass per unit area were obtained by drying and weighing aboveground materials for tidal marshes and seagrasses, and using field measurements and allometric equations (specific to the region and species) for mangroves 59,60 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aboveground plant biomass calculations in this study followed a well‐established protocol [ Kauffman and Donato , ] using published mangrove allometric equations and wood densities specific to the region [ Guerra‐Santos et al , ; Kauffman and Donato , ; Kauffman et al , ; Komiyama et al , ; Santini et al , ] (Figure ). To determine belowground carbon stocks, a sediment core was collected at the center of each of the six aboveground plant biomass plots in each of the six study regions (for a total of 36 sediment cores), using a Russian peat auger with extensions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some debate over how mangrove ecosystems should be classified. Historically, scholars have referred to these plants as forests (see for example Eslami‐Andargoli, Dale, Sipe, & Chaseling, ; Guerra‐Santos et al, ; Lugo & Snedaker, ), and this classification is by far the most common. More recently, though, Gopal () suggested that mangroves be classified as wetlands, arguing that this will allow for a more appropriate approach to their management.…”
Section: Mangroves: Description and Spatial Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%