2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2020.116133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dimensional arguments estimate the dissipation rate from the velocity fluctuations as ǫ = cσ 3 u /L i [34,35] involving the integral scale L i , and c a constant of the order of unity [36,37]. Here, one finds c = 1.1 close to the values found with a boundary forcing (grid turbulence) [35,38]. These estimations of ǫ by five different methods are hardly obtained experimentally [39] and are found here to be all consistent as a consequence of the stationary, homogeneous and isotropic turbulence generated by this forcing in volume.…”
Section: Energy Dissipation Ratesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Dimensional arguments estimate the dissipation rate from the velocity fluctuations as ǫ = cσ 3 u /L i [34,35] involving the integral scale L i , and c a constant of the order of unity [36,37]. Here, one finds c = 1.1 close to the values found with a boundary forcing (grid turbulence) [35,38]. These estimations of ǫ by five different methods are hardly obtained experimentally [39] and are found here to be all consistent as a consequence of the stationary, homogeneous and isotropic turbulence generated by this forcing in volume.…”
Section: Energy Dissipation Ratesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The statistical treatment of turbulence is a vast subject, far beyond the scope of this lecture. The reader is referred to Pope (2000); Tennekes (1972); Davidson (2004); Mcdonough (2004) for an comprehensive introduction on the topic and to Saarenrinne and Piirto (2000); Lavoie et al (2007); Segalini et al (2014); Scharnowski et al (2018); Ayegba and Edomwonyi-Otu (2020); Wang et al (2021) for a discussion on the impact of measurement resolution on the main turbulence variables. This section recalls the definitions that are required to solve the provided exercises.…”
Section: A Note On Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its complete 3D form, this is defined as ε = ν ∂ x i u j (∂ x j u i + ∂ x i u j ) , with ν the kinematic viscosity, having used the indices i, j = 1, 2, 3 to index the velocity components and axes and having implied summation. The full expression counts 12 terms and it is of difficult evaluation in a 2D measurement because of the missing information in the direction normal to the measurement plane (see Saarenrinne and Piirto (2000); Wang et al (2021) for an interesting discussion). This quantity measures the rate at which turbulence energy is converted into thermal energy by viscous dissipation and is essential in the modeling of turbulent flows.…”
Section: A Note On Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard κ − model is chosen as the turbulence model, which is composed of turbulent kinetic energy equation and turbulent dissipation rate equation [28,29].…”
Section: Governing Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%