2012
DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2011.629977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the effects of price and billing frequency on household water demand using a panel of Wisconsin municipalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conclusion reached was positive for the impact of monthly billing on water conservation. They determined a 3.7% reduction in household water usage for monthly billing against a longer billing frequency [81]. Their study confirmed a reduction in water demand through monthly billing to the utility through providing more information to their customers and creating an increased awareness of the costs of water.…”
Section: Usage Costmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The conclusion reached was positive for the impact of monthly billing on water conservation. They determined a 3.7% reduction in household water usage for monthly billing against a longer billing frequency [81]. Their study confirmed a reduction in water demand through monthly billing to the utility through providing more information to their customers and creating an increased awareness of the costs of water.…”
Section: Usage Costmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In the same study, Fenrick and Getachew also identified the impact of introducing water efficient appliances on total demand and determined a 1.1% reduction in per capita water use due to the household adoption of water efficient technology [81]. Digital water metering may improve the measurement of impact of appliance efficiency on total demand.…”
Section: Usage Costmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Panel data models are typically preferred to the time-series and cross-sectional models because they include the advantages of both models and can provide more accurate parameter estimates (Arbu es et al, 2003;Polebitski and Palmer, 2010). In recent years with increase in the data availability these models have been used more frequently (Nauges and Thomas, 2000;Martinez-Espiñeira, 2002;Arbu es et al, 2004Arbu es et al, , 2010Kenney et al, 2008;Polebitski and Palmer, 2010;Fenrick and Getachew, 2012). However, to the knowledge of the authors, the panel data model never has been used for the water demand analysis in the apartment sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%