2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.08.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the influence of different incidence angle modifier models on the biaxial factorization approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study [67], the simple analytical model has been validated against other models and commercial collectors specifications and has been found that the model predicts the IAMs in an accurate way with the deviation up to only 5%. It is worth mentioning that using the factorized IAM will generally predict the annual performance of up to 5% of the real energy production because of the high error when the range of the incident angle is high [68]. Additionally, compared to the heat losses, LFR optical losses have a greater effect on the performance [69].…”
Section: Incident Angel Modifier Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study [67], the simple analytical model has been validated against other models and commercial collectors specifications and has been found that the model predicts the IAMs in an accurate way with the deviation up to only 5%. It is worth mentioning that using the factorized IAM will generally predict the annual performance of up to 5% of the real energy production because of the high error when the range of the incident angle is high [68]. Additionally, compared to the heat losses, LFR optical losses have a greater effect on the performance [69].…”
Section: Incident Angel Modifier Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solar collectors need to be run under specific incidence angle conditions over a period of time by power energy input and the test requirement is relatively rigorous in the steady-state. Particularly, determination of the IAM of solar collectors with variable geometries is more complicated because there are more than one direction of dependence for the IAM (Sallaberry et al, 2015;Hertel et al, 2015). The present study aims to introduce a quick measurement method for identifying the collector IAM using a spectroradiometer.…”
Section: Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incidence Angle Modifier (IAM) is known as the variance in output performance of a solar collector as the angle of the sun changes in relation to the surface of the collector, with respect to irradiance under normal incidence (Hertel et al 2015). Both transversal (IAMT) and longitudinal (IAML) planes were used for IAM's calculation, with increments of 10º.…”
Section: Incidence Angle Modifiermentioning
confidence: 99%