2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the inter-annual marginal value of additional feed and its replacement cost for beef cattle systems in the Flooding Pampas of Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although intensive systems use more land resources, they have the potential to remove carbon from biomass and the soil [17]. In this case, grazing and feeding practices are essential to achieve better results [68]. It leads to a synergy between industries, design, and production management [69].…”
Section: (4) Employing Technology and Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although intensive systems use more land resources, they have the potential to remove carbon from biomass and the soil [17]. In this case, grazing and feeding practices are essential to achieve better results [68]. It leads to a synergy between industries, design, and production management [69].…”
Section: (4) Employing Technology and Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decision is influenced partly by profitability expectations between cattle grazing on natural grasslands or grassland replacement by cultivated forage and grain crops and partly by other economic parameters such as risk minimization and income continuity throughout the year [25]. Modeling to estimate the costs of different forage supplies in Flooding Pampa cattle farms concluded that livestock production systems require feeding regimes that diversify the forage base to improve carrying capacity while reducing dependence on external inputs and vulnerability to economic risks [26]. Ecological intensification is an alternative to improve farm production while reducing external inputs [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%