2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the number of specimens required for acquiring reliable rock mechanical parameters in laboratory uniaxial compression tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar studies are found in the literature regarding the attainment of the minimum number of specimens required for a given experiment [18], [19], ensuring that this minimum number still produces relevant results for the scientific community. For example, Jie Cui et al [18] evaluate the possibility of estimating the number of specimens required in a mechanical experiment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Similar studies are found in the literature regarding the attainment of the minimum number of specimens required for a given experiment [18], [19], ensuring that this minimum number still produces relevant results for the scientific community. For example, Jie Cui et al [18] evaluate the possibility of estimating the number of specimens required in a mechanical experiment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, there are still some unsolved problems. The heterogeneity and randomness of natural rocks lead to a significant discreteness of macroscopic mechanical parameters of such material (Yamaguchi, 1970;Ruffolo et al, 2009;Cui et al, 2017). For the discrete element model, the randomly distributed particles could be used to simulate the heterogeneous characteristic of rocks, but how does particle distribution affect the macroscopic strength of the model has not been systematically studied yet.…”
Section: Var(x)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data of basalt rock uniaxial compressive strength parameter (S) are taken from (Cui et al, 2017) and shown in Table 2a. Analyze the data by the Persian curve method.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%