2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the soil-water characteristic curve from the grain size distribution of coarse-grained soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the SWCC of the treated loess trended to the upper right compared with the untreated loess, that is, under the same matrix suction, the treated loess had a higher volumetric water content than the untreated loess. These results are in line with previous findings (Eyo et al, 2020;Zhai et al, 2020). White et al (1970) and Vanapalli et al (1999) suggested that the SWCC can be divided into three stages namely boundary effect, transition, and unsaturated.…”
Section: Effect Of Clps On Soil Water Retentionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, the SWCC of the treated loess trended to the upper right compared with the untreated loess, that is, under the same matrix suction, the treated loess had a higher volumetric water content than the untreated loess. These results are in line with previous findings (Eyo et al, 2020;Zhai et al, 2020). White et al (1970) and Vanapalli et al (1999) suggested that the SWCC can be divided into three stages namely boundary effect, transition, and unsaturated.…”
Section: Effect Of Clps On Soil Water Retentionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…At the same volumetric moisture content, the matrix suction of top tailings is greater than that of bottom tailings, the matrix suction of top tailings is 18.6% higher than that of bottom tailings under natural volumetric moisture content (14.0%). According to the experimental results of the previous studies (Chen et al, 2018;Zhai et al, 2020), the matrix suction increased with decreasing soil particle size (Negative correlation) and with increasing non-uniformity coefficient (Positive correlation). However, as can be seen from Figure 5, experimental results show that tailings (Top tailings) with minor uniformity coefficients have larger matrix suction, indicating that the particle size plays a more important role than the non-uniformity coefficient to affect the matrix suction of fine-grained tailings.…”
Section: Effect Of Particle Gradation On the Swcc Of Fine-grained Tailingsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…During the past few decades, many empirical models have been developed to predict SWCC, such as the Van-Genuechten (1980), Brooks-Corey (1964), Fredlund and Xing (1994), Gardner (1958), etc., and researchers also compared and evaluated the applicability and consistency of various empirical models (Matlan et al, 2015;Fattah et al, 2021). Based on this, the scholars investigated the SWCC of clay (Tripathy et al, 2014;Li et al, 2017), sand (Yan and Zhang, 2015), and expansive soil (Tamer et al, 2017;Ahmed et al, 2018), and they analyzed the effect of dry density (Birle et al, 2008;Gallage and Uchimura, 2010), void ratio (Heshmati and Motahari, 2015), grain size distribution (Chen et al, 2018;Zhai et al, 2020), and temperature (ElKeshky, 2011;Qiao et al, 2019) on the SWCC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In subcritical hydrophobic soils, the contact angle is between 0 to 90 degrees. In these soils, water slowly enters the soil (17). In real hydrophobic soils, the contact angle reaches more than 90 degrees preventing water from entering the soil (18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%