1978
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9517(78)90346-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the zeolite content of a catalyst from nitrogen adsorption isotherms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment of specific surface areas (BET and t-plot methods) was performed with N 2 isotherms at 77 K and the zeolite content (wt.%) was determined following the method by Johnson [14]. The zeolite unit cell sizes (UCS) were determined with the ASTM D-3942-91 X-ray diffraction technique, using a Shimadzu XD-1 equipment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of specific surface areas (BET and t-plot methods) was performed with N 2 isotherms at 77 K and the zeolite content (wt.%) was determined following the method by Johnson [14]. The zeolite unit cell sizes (UCS) were determined with the ASTM D-3942-91 X-ray diffraction technique, using a Shimadzu XD-1 equipment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An error of 5%, mainly from the purification procedure, had already been considered in the zeolite content determinations (Erdem-~enatalar et al 1993). It is also known that X-ray line intensities may not always be proportional to the zeolite contents (Johnson 1978;Valyon et al 1981;Ming and Dixon 1987).…”
Section: Samples In H-formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semiquantitative XRD, for which the calibration curve has to be prepared with a purified zeolite sample, is the most commonly applied technique for this purpose. Making use of the relationships between ion exchange or adsorption performances and zeolite content have been proposed (Johnson 1978;Valyon et al 1981;Sheppard and Gude 1982;Kallo et al 1982;Sersale 1985) as alternatives to the time-consuming, cumbersome and sometimes inaccurate X-ray procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a determination of specific surface area of granulated samples, the air-permeability method and the gas adsorption method are generally used [64]. The gas adsorption method is used more widely and can determine the total surface area including cracks and micro pores [65]. By the reasons, the specific surface areas of employed minerals were measured by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller gas adsorption method [66] which is widely used and useful [34].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%