Estimation of Tissue Attenuation from Ultrasonic B-Mode Images—Spectral-Log-Difference and Method-of-Moments Algorithms Compared

Abstract

We report on results from the comparison of two algorithms designed to estimate the attenuation coefficient from ultrasonic B-mode scans obtained from a numerical phantom simulating an ultrasound breast scan. It is well documented that this parameter significantly diverges between normal tissue and malignant lesions. To improve the diagnostic accuracy it is of great importance to devise and test algorithms that facilitate the accurate, low variance and spatially resolved estimation of the tissue’s attenuation properties. A numerical phantom is realized using k-Wave, which is an open source Matlab toolbox for the time-domain simulation of acoustic wave fields that facilitates both linear and nonlinear wave propagation in homogeneous and heterogeneous tissue, as compared to strictly linear ultrasound simulation tools like Field II. k-Wave allows to simulate arbitrary distributions, resolved down to single voxel sizes, of parameters including the speed of sound, mass density, scattering strength and to include power law acoustic absorption necessary for simulation tasks in medical diagnostic ultrasound. We analyze the properties and the attainable accuracy of both the spectral-log-difference technique, and a statistical moments based approach and compare the results to known reference values from the sound field simulation.

Quantitative Photoacoustic Tomography Using Iteratively Refined Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion: A Simulation Study

“…Therefore, these techniques can be effective for estimating accurate SOS and acoustic attenuation maps from US data. Several algorithms have been proposed for this very purpose [89][90][91]. Some limitations of these US methods are sensitivity to the selection of the initial model [90], massive computational burden [92], and suboptimal reconstruction of the acoustic attenuation map [93].…”

Fast and Selective Super-Resolution Ultrasound In Vivo With Acoustically Activated Nanodroplets

“…This is true at zero degree transmission but changes when transmitting with a tilted angle. In addition, tissue attenuation my vary between 0 = 0.03 -4 dB/(MHz•cm) within the plane of view [56]. This inhomogeneity can interfere with nanodroplet activation and impede the maintenance of the appropriate or desired local concentration.…”

Pulse-echo ultrasound attenuation tomography

“…Imaging techniques that quantify the spatial distribution of ultrasound attenuation in tissue can offer a versatile tool to overcome the limitations of CAP. Several approaches have been suggested using either timedomain (Ghoshal and Oelze 2012) or frequency-domain formulations (Kim and Varghese 2008, Kanayama et al 2013, Pawlicki and O'Brien 2013, Coila and Lavarello 2018, Brandner et al 2021. Although computationally more demanding, the latter are more common as they provide efficient ways to compensate for system-and transducer-dependent effects.…”