2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of tree canopy cover in evergreen oak woodlands using remote sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
93
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
93
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, plants with high vegetative vigor absorb more EMR in B4 band (Jensen, 2009), which reveals the high photosynthetic activity, since leaf pigments absorb a greater amount of the radiation incident on the leaves, which is essential for their growth. Carreiras et al (2006) found that the increase in canopy coverage, considering the same background class, led to an increase in reflectance in B5 band and a decrease in B4 band, as observed in Landsat data. This is why Jensen (2009) states that, as the canopy develops, pixel reflectance tends to suffer less interference from the soil line.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In contrast, plants with high vegetative vigor absorb more EMR in B4 band (Jensen, 2009), which reveals the high photosynthetic activity, since leaf pigments absorb a greater amount of the radiation incident on the leaves, which is essential for their growth. Carreiras et al (2006) found that the increase in canopy coverage, considering the same background class, led to an increase in reflectance in B5 band and a decrease in B4 band, as observed in Landsat data. This is why Jensen (2009) states that, as the canopy develops, pixel reflectance tends to suffer less interference from the soil line.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Similar conclusions were reported by Purevdorj et al [57] relative to the better performance of SAVI to estimate the vegetation cover for low crop densities. Differently, in a study with savannah-type open woodlands dominated by evergreen oak species (montados or dehesa), the NDVI performed slightly better than SAVI for the estimation of tree canopy cover [58] but the study areas were characterized by an extremely variable understory including bare soil, dry grass and a few evergreen shrubs that impacted the VIs values as discussed by the authors.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Fraction Of Ground Cover From Vegetation Imentioning
confidence: 83%
“…To highlight spectral difference among stands of different age rubber trees, e.g., mature, middle and young, as well as that among rubber trees and deciduous forest, shrubs and bare soil etc., we employed KTT on the six reflective TM bands to produce soil brightness, vegetation greenness, and soil/vegetation wetness components. The vegetation greenness component is well correlated with tree canopy cover, leaf area index and live biomass above ground [37]; therefore it was expected to be able to capture difference among stands of rubber trees of diverse ages due to differences in canopy densities. The soil brightness component expresses differences in soil properties, such as particle size and organic matter content; and the soil/vegetation wetness component is sensitive to soil and plant moisture [37].…”
Section: Development Of Input Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vegetation greenness component is well correlated with tree canopy cover, leaf area index and live biomass above ground [37]; therefore it was expected to be able to capture difference among stands of rubber trees of diverse ages due to differences in canopy densities. The soil brightness component expresses differences in soil properties, such as particle size and organic matter content; and the soil/vegetation wetness component is sensitive to soil and plant moisture [37]. These two components together were expected to capture difference between young rubber trees (dominated by bare soil or shrubs) and pure bare soil fallow fields.…”
Section: Development Of Input Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%