2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020jf005583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Tsunami Characteristics from Deposits: Inverse Modeling Using a Deep‐Learning Neural Network

Abstract: Tsunami deposits provide information for estimating the magnitude and flow conditions of paleotsunamis, and inverse models have potential for reconstructing hydraulic conditions of tsunamis from their deposits. The majority of the previously proposed models are based on oversimplified assumptions and possess some limitations. We present a new inverse model based on the FITTNUSS model, which incorporates nonuniform and unsteady transport of suspended sediment and turbulent mixing. The present model uses a deep … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Code and data availability. The source codes and all other data of the DNN inverse model are available in Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4744889, Mitra et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Code and data availability. The source codes and all other data of the DNN inverse model are available in Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4744889, Mitra et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feed-forward calculation results of the inversion network during the training process are evaluated by the loss function. We choose the mean squared error (Mitra et al, 2020) as the loss function of the inversion network:…”
Section: Inversion Methodology Based On Cnnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feed‐forward calculation results of the inversion network during the training process are evaluated by the loss function. We choose the mean squared error (Mitra et al., 2020) as the loss function of the inversion network: J=1N(ZpreZla)2 where N is the number of elements in the sediment‐basement‐interface grid, Zla is the depth of the sediment‐basement‐interface model (label), and Zpre is the predicted depth calculated by CNN. The values of this loss function, which quantifies how close the mapping from the gravity anomaly to the sediment interface, is averaged over the entire data set (Patterson & Gibson, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 10 years since the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake (Mw 9.0), tsunami-deposit research has shown dramatic progress not only in Japan but also across the world (Goto et al 2014(Goto et al , 2021Costa and Andrade 2020;Sawai 2020;Sugawara 2021). In addition to the discovery of new tsunami deposits, research on numerical modeling of tsunami and sediment transport (Sugawara 2021) and on tsunami size estimation (Namegaya and Satake 2014;Ishimura and Yamada 2019;Naruse and Abe 2017;Mitra et al 2020Mitra et al , 2021 has been conducted. In particular, geological surveys were performed at multiple sites along the Pacific Coast of the Tohoku region where the 2011 tsunami inundated provided thousands of years of tsunami history (e.g., Goto et al 2015;Miyauchi 2015, 2017;Takada et al 2016;Inoue et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%