2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-011-0460-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of uniaxial compressive strength based on P-wave and Schmidt hammer rebound using statistical method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of these Equations were evaluated through calculating the root mean square error (RMSE) obtained by Equation (13) (Minaeian and Ahangari, 2013). In this regard, is the slake durability index (second cycle) obtained from the experiments and corresponding relationships.…”
Section: Comparison the Equation Proposed In This Paper And Those Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The performance of these Equations were evaluated through calculating the root mean square error (RMSE) obtained by Equation (13) (Minaeian and Ahangari, 2013). In this regard, is the slake durability index (second cycle) obtained from the experiments and corresponding relationships.…”
Section: Comparison the Equation Proposed In This Paper And Those Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of previous studies concentrated on the application of P-wave velocity for estimating uniaxial compressive strength and tensile strength. For instance, Minaeian and Ahangari (2013) estimated uniaxial compressive strength based on P-wave velocity, which yielded desirable results. The equations obtained from the simple linear regression entailed a coefficient of determination (R 2 ) equal to 0.94 (Minaeian and Ahangari, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, in order to control the performance of the proposed equations, the root mean square error (RMSE) and value account for (VAF) are determined using relations 7 and 8. y and y' are the measured and estimated tensile strengths, respectively (Minaeian and Ahangari, 2011).…”
Section: Accuracy Of Relations Is Discussed Now This Means That Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some impeding factors, such as obtaining standard intact rock samples especially in highly jointed faulted rock, exist in determination of UCS directly. Further, performing the direct test to measure the UCS of rock is relatively expensive and time consuming as well [1][2][3]. Due to that, an Abstract Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of rock is crucial for any type of projects constructed in/on rock mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%