2004
DOI: 10.21608/ejar.2004.256810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Variance Components Based on Diallel Crosses of Four Lines of Norfa Chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results indicate that additive genetic variance may be a common in the inheritance of these trait. This conclusion dealt with those cited by Abdou, 2004 andAbou El-Ghar, 2005). The observed estimates of random environmental variation (σ²e) were - 85870517.2, -229250, -193661.8, -6.1017 and -3.77827, respectively.…”
Section: Results and Discutionssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…These results indicate that additive genetic variance may be a common in the inheritance of these trait. This conclusion dealt with those cited by Abdou, 2004 andAbou El-Ghar, 2005). The observed estimates of random environmental variation (σ²e) were - 85870517.2, -229250, -193661.8, -6.1017 and -3.77827, respectively.…”
Section: Results and Discutionssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…At the last generation of the study average of BWM in second was heavier than first generatin by 11.177 g. Current study results of Norfa mature body weight are in good agreement with those found by researchers over-time. From the reviewed articles, Norfa chickens body weight at maturity ranged from 1007.8 g (El-Wardany et al, 1992) and 1549.0 g (Abou El-Ghar, 2003).…”
Section: Body Weight At Maturity (Bwm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current results are close to those reported by some previous works on the same strain (Norfa), especially, for light body weight lines and selected lines for egg number (El-Wardany 1987, El-Wardany et al 1992, Abou El-Ghar 1994and El-Salamony 1996 with average of BWM ranged between 1007.8 to 1096.0 g. Slightly higher values were recorded (1117.8 -1192 g) by some researchers for different types of Norfa lines (Enab 1991, Enab et al 1992a, Enab et al 1992b, Ben Naser 2007, Abou-Elewa 2010 and El-Weshahy 2010). In addition, higher values of body weight at maturity were obtained with average ranged from 1204.0 to 1549.0 g (Sherif 1991, Abdou and Enab 1994, Abou El-Ghar 1994, Nawar 1995, Abdou 1996, El-Salamony 1996, Harfoush 1997, El-Sakka 1999, Enab et al 2000, Enab 2001, El-Hadad 2003, Abou-Elewa 2004, Abou El-Ghar and Abdou 2004, Ben Naser 2007and El-Weshahy 2010. Regarding the reviewed literature, we didn't find any lower values of BWM in Norfa females than these reported in our research.…”
Section: Body Weight At Maturity (Bwm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean of EWSM was 32.0 ± 3.26 g in the current experiment as shown in Table (2) Comparing with early studies conducted on Norfa strain, the value obtained by the present study was the lowest one. Some investigators reported different estimates of the EWSM average ranged from 32.7 to 44.2 g (Enab 1991, Sherif 1991, Abou El-Ghar 1994, Nawar 1995, El-Salamony 1996, Enab 1996, Gomaa 1997, Harfoush 1997, El-Sakka 1999, El-Hadad 2003, Abou El-Ghar and Abdou 2004, Ben Naser 2007, Abou-Elewa 2010and El-Weshahy 2010. The low EWSM value in the current experiment should be correlated to the low BWSM recorded, since it has been reported that, EWSM positively correlated with body weight at sexual maturity.…”
Section: Egg Weight At Sexual Maturity (Ewsm)mentioning
confidence: 99%