2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2010.10.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of void boundaries in flow field using expectation–maximization algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the major limitations of both the EKF and UKF is that the coefficients of state and measurement noise covariance matrices, which are integral parts of these algorithms, need to be manually tuned and may lead to suboptimal performance, if they are not tuned well. Based upon the assumption that it is possible to model the initial conditions, the state evolution and the likelihood of the measurement data using a Gaussian distribution, Khambampati et al (2011) employed the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm to track the void boundaries in the flow process. EM, which calculates the mode of the proposed likelihood function through the expectation and maximization steps, guarantees convergence (Dempster et al 1977, Shumway andStoffer 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major limitations of both the EKF and UKF is that the coefficients of state and measurement noise covariance matrices, which are integral parts of these algorithms, need to be manually tuned and may lead to suboptimal performance, if they are not tuned well. Based upon the assumption that it is possible to model the initial conditions, the state evolution and the likelihood of the measurement data using a Gaussian distribution, Khambampati et al (2011) employed the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm to track the void boundaries in the flow process. EM, which calculates the mode of the proposed likelihood function through the expectation and maximization steps, guarantees convergence (Dempster et al 1977, Shumway andStoffer 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%