2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation procedure of J-resistance curves for SE(T) fracture specimens using unloading compliance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
99
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
99
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…[13,49] The HEAC properties in Figure 14, from elastoplastic K J analysis of a small specimen, are quantitatively relevant to a structure under elastic loading, following the J-integral approach. [58,60,66,67,[76][77][78] To verify this assertion, it is necessary to demonstrate K and J dominance of crack tip mechanics. [52] K dominance is established by comparing the uncracked SENT ligament (W-a) and plane strain plastic zone diameter (estimated using the Ramberg-Osgood flow properties for Monel K-500) for the deepest crack and high-elastic K of 50 MPaÖm.…”
Section: Mpa√mmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[13,49] The HEAC properties in Figure 14, from elastoplastic K J analysis of a small specimen, are quantitatively relevant to a structure under elastic loading, following the J-integral approach. [58,60,66,67,[76][77][78] To verify this assertion, it is necessary to demonstrate K and J dominance of crack tip mechanics. [52] K dominance is established by comparing the uncracked SENT ligament (W-a) and plane strain plastic zone diameter (estimated using the Ramberg-Osgood flow properties for Monel K-500) for the deepest crack and high-elastic K of 50 MPaÖm.…”
Section: Mpa√mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[65] Stress state dependent terms in Eqs. [4] through [7] were assumed to be plane strain values, justified by three-dimensional finite element analyses [66,67] and the flat Mode I appearance of all EAC surfaces for Monel K-500.…”
Section: ½7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3a and b, respectively) over the range a/W ¼ 0.125 to 0.625 in equal steps of 0.125. These values are then compared with those calculated by Chiodo et al [6,7] and John et al [8] (Fig. 4a).…”
Section: Verification Of the K I Calculation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given their complexity, preference has been given in this paper to a more hands-on, analytical approach. A number of equations are available in literature, all based on elastic 2D finite element simulations [12,13,36,37]. A comparative study indicated only minor differences between these equations.…”
Section: Appendix A: Unloading Compliance Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%