1994
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1994.1035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a "Dichotomous Choice with Follow-Up" Questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
313
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 407 publications
(326 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
313
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recognising the large sample sizes required for statistically significant estimation when using the SB choice format, some CV surveys have incorporated a follow-up question in the elicitation format. Numerous studies have found differences in WTP implied by the first and second questions in this doublebounded CV format (Cameron and Quiggin, 1994;Hanemann et al, 1991;McFadden and Leonard, 1995). Several interpretations of the difference have been given.…”
Section: Elicitation Format and Stated Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recognising the large sample sizes required for statistically significant estimation when using the SB choice format, some CV surveys have incorporated a follow-up question in the elicitation format. Numerous studies have found differences in WTP implied by the first and second questions in this doublebounded CV format (Cameron and Quiggin, 1994;Hanemann et al, 1991;McFadden and Leonard, 1995). Several interpretations of the difference have been given.…”
Section: Elicitation Format and Stated Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is because there is evidence that some of the responses to the second bid are inconsistent with the responses to the first bid. A number of studies have dealt with this issue and have concluded that the DB elicitation method is internally inconsistent in that the hypothesis (that the first and second responses in the DB DC experiment are drawn from the same distribution) can be rejected at the 1% level (e.g., Cameron and Quiggin, 1994;McFadden, 1994). Bateman et al (2001) considered a variety of potential causes of such inconsistencies, tested both the effects caused by moving from SB to DB, and suggested that the responses to the second follow-up DB questions should not be used as the basis of valuation exercises.…”
Section: Elicitation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed the so-called double-bounded dichotomous-choice format to elicit households WTP for improved public health services (Hanemann et al, 1991;Arrow et al, 1993;Cameroon and Quiggin, 1994). A dichotomous choice payment question asks the respondent if she would pay Birr X to obtain the good.…”
Section: Wtp Elicitation Formatmentioning
confidence: 99%