Estimulación en el hogar y desarrollo motor en niños mexicanos de 36 meses

Osorio, Erika; Torres‐Sánchez, Luisa; Hernández, María del Carmen; López‐Carrillo, Lizbeth; Schnaas, Lourdes

doi:10.1590/s0036-36342010000100004

Cited by 18 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…At child age 12 months, trained field workers conducted home visits to collect information about the home environment, using a Spanish version of the Infant/Toddler Home Observations for Measurement of the Environment inventory (HOME) that has been pretested and used in previous studies in Mexico [ 39 , 40 ]. This widely-used measure consists of 45 yes/no questions divided into six subscales: parental responsivity, acceptance of child, organization of the environment, provision of appropriate materials, parental involvement, and variety of stimulation.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prenatal Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation and Offspring Development at 18 Months: Randomized Controlled Trial

et al. 2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveWe evaluated the effects of prenatal docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation on offspring development at 18 months of age.DesignRandomized placebo double-blind controlled trial.SettingsCuernavaca, Mexico.Participants and MethodsWe followed up offspring (n = 730; 75% of the birth cohort) of women in Mexico who participated in a trial of DHA supplementation during the latter half of pregnancy. We assessed the effect of the intervention on child development and the potential modifying effects of gravidity, gender, SES, and quality of the home environment.Interventions or Main Exposures400 mg/day of algal DHA.Outcome MeasuresChild development at 18 months of age measured using the Spanish version of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II. We calculated standardized psychomotor and mental development indices, and behavior rating scale scores.ResultsIntent-to-treat differences (DHA-control) were: Psychomotor Developmental Index -0.90 (95% CI: -2.35, 0.56), Mental Developmental Index -0.26 (95% CI: -1.63, 1.10) and Behavior Rating Scale -0.01 (95% CI: -0.95, 0.94). Prenatal DHA intake attenuated the positive association between home environment and psychomotor development index observed in the control group (p for interaction = 0.03) suggesting potential benefits for children living in home environments characterized by reduced caregiver interactions and opportunities for early childhood stimulation.ConclusionsPrenatal DHA supplementation in a population with low intakes of DHA had no effects on offspring development at 18 months of age although there may be some benefit for infants from poor quality home environments.Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00646360

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prenatal Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation and Offspring Development at 18 Months: Randomized Controlled Trial

et al. 2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…las diferentes habilidades pertenecientes a la coordinación motriz son medidas con diferentes pruebas, dependiendo de su especificidad; no obstante, las altas correlaciones entre las diferentes pruebas muestran la posibilidad de estar midiendo un sólo constructo: la habilidad mecánica (aiken, 1996). la motricidad óculo-manual es medida usualmente para fines de contratación laboral, pero otros estudios muestran cómo se relaciona de manera significativa con otras variables como por ejemplo, el desarrollo evolutivo del lenguaje (berdicewski & milicic, 1979); el desarrollo de la inteligencia verbal y no verbal (Garaigordobil, 1999); la respiración diafragmática (Puerta & cruz, 2003); el desarrollo cognitivo en niños (Wassenberg, et al, 2005); la estimulación en el hogar (Osorio, torres, hernández, lópez & schnaas, 2010); la lateralidad y la dominancia (Kaufman s., zalma, nadeen & Kaufman, 1978;Florez & troyo, 2001); y la obesidad (Gentier, et al, 2013). todas las relaciones que guarda esta capacidad con otras variables permiten observar que su medida es necesaria para procesos de evaluación psicológica en diferentes áreas de trabajo.…”

Section: La Medición De La Coordinación Visomotoraunclassified

Fine and gross motor skills differ between healthy-weight and obese children

Gentier

D’Hondt

Shultz

et al. 2013

Research in Developmental Disabilities

121

100

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Within the obesity literature, focus is put on the link between weight status and gross motor skills. However, research on fine motor skills in the obese (OB) childhood population is limited. Therefore, the present study focused on possible weight related differences in gross as well as fine motor skill tasks. Thirty-four OB children (12 ♀ and 22 ♂, aged 7-13 years) were recruited prior to participating in a multidisciplinary treatment program at the Zeepreventorium (De Haan, Belgium). Additionally, a control group of 34 age and gender-matched healthy-weight (HW) children was included in the study. Anthropometric measures were recorded and gross and fine motor skills were assessed using the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, second edition (BOT-2). Results were analyzed by independent samples t-tests, multivariate analysis of variance, and a chi-squared test. Being OB was detrimental for all subtests evaluating gross motor skill performance (i.e., upper-limb coordination, bilateral coordination, balance, running speed and agility, and strength). Furthermore, OB children performed worse in fine motor precision and a manual dexterity task, when compared to their HW peers. No group differences existed for the fine motor integration task. Our study provides evidence that lower motor competence in OB children is not limited to gross motor skills alone; OB children are also affected by fine motor skill problems. Further investigation is warranted to provide possible explanations for these differences. It is tentatively suggested that OB children experience difficulties with the integration and processing of sensory information. Future research is needed to explore whether this assumption is correct and what the underlying mechanism(s) could be.

show abstract

“…Crosssectional studies using a combination of parent and observer reports during a home visit show similar results (Hamadani et al, 2006;Patel et al, 2013;Rubio-Codina et al, 2016). For instance, home stimulation was positively associated with a composite of fine and gross motor skills among three-year-old children in Mexico (Osorio et al, 2010) and 7-to 9-year-old children in Nepal (Patel et al, 2013). More specifically, home stimulation was positively linked to fine motor skills among children ages 6 months to 3.5 years in Colombia, in a study that did not combine fine and gross motor skills (Rubio-Codina et al, 2016).…”

Section: Home Stimulation and Young Children's Motor Skillsmentioning

confidence: 67%

Early and concurrent home stimulation: Unique and indirect links with fine motor skills among 4-year-old children in rural Pakistan.

Armstrong‐Carter

Sulik

Siyal

et al. 2021

Developmental Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fine motor skills enable children to make precise and coordinated movements with their hands and support their ability to engage in everyday activities and learning experiences. In a longitudinal study of 1,058 4-year-old children in rural Pakistan (n = 488 girls), we examined how prior and concurrent levels of home stimulation relate to change in fine motor skills from ages 2 to 4 while controlling for family wealth, maternal education, number of siblings at birth, prior and concurrent measures of children's physical growth and food insecurity, and prior motor skills at age 2. Moreover, we tested whether the association between early home stimulation and subsequent fine motor skills was mediated by physical growth, food insecurity, motor skills at age 2, and concurrent home stimulation. Results revealed that home stimulation at 18 months was positively associated with change in fine motor skills from ages 2 to 4, over and above family socioeconomic resources. This association was mediated by physical growth, food insecurity and motor skills at age 2. In contrast to home stimulation at 18 months, home stimulation at age 4 was positively associated with concurrent motor skills at age 4 when controlling for all antecedent family factors, as well as prior and concurrent measures of physical growth and food insecurity, and prior motor skills at age 2. Findings suggest that the preschool period may be an important window of time when physically and cognitively stimulating experiences at home uniquely relate to variability in fine motor development.

show abstract

Estimulación en el hogar y desarrollo motor en niños mexicanos de 36 meses

Cited by 18 publications

References 24 publications

Prenatal Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation and Offspring Development at 18 Months: Randomized Controlled Trial

Prenatal Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation and Offspring Development at 18 Months: Randomized Controlled Trial

Fine and gross motor skills differ between healthy-weight and obese children

Early and concurrent home stimulation: Unique and indirect links with fine motor skills among 4-year-old children in rural Pakistan.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About