2014
DOI: 10.7775/rac.es.v82.i6.4527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estratificación del riesgo cardiovascular utilizando diferentes puntajes de riesgo en prevención primaria. Implicancias en la indicación de estatinas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported in previous studies, in which 20-30% of patients categorized as "low risk" by different scores exhibited CAP. (23,24) Likewise, in large population-based studies, 11% to 15% "low-risk" patients were recategorized when CAC score was considered. (25) Although the percentages are lower than those reported in our paper, our sample of patients is made up of individuals who consulted for cardiovascular risk assessment and had a higher prevalence of risk factors compared to the general population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results were reported in previous studies, in which 20-30% of patients categorized as "low risk" by different scores exhibited CAP. (23,24) Likewise, in large population-based studies, 11% to 15% "low-risk" patients were recategorized when CAC score was considered. (25) Although the percentages are lower than those reported in our paper, our sample of patients is made up of individuals who consulted for cardiovascular risk assessment and had a higher prevalence of risk factors compared to the general population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our group previously investigated the clinical applicability of different scores in a primary prevention population without specifically assessing the overweight or obese population. 12 On the other hand, there is evidence that the addition of information regarding the presence or absence of a carotid atherosclerotic plaque (CAP) to a model consisting of the traditional risk factors facilitates the prediction of cardiovascular events. 13 The optimal cut-off point (OCP) that best discriminates between subjects with or without CAP in several risk scores has previously been assessed, 12,14,15 but a similar analysis has not been reported in the population with an increased BMI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las mismas recomiendan un nuevo puntaje de riesgo (NP), aunque tampoco incluye para su cálculo al sobrepeso o la obesidad. Nuestro grupo ha investigado previamente la aplicabilidad clínica de diferentes puntajes en una población en prevención primaria, sin evaluar específicamente a la población con sobrepeso u obesidad 12 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…El punto de corte óptimo (PCO) que mejor discrimina entre sujetos con o sin PAC de varios puntajes de riesgo han sido previamente evaluados 12,14,15 , aunque no se ha reportado un análisis similar en la población con un IMC aumentado.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified