2016
DOI: 10.18273/revbol.v38n1-2016006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ESTRATIGRAFÍA, PETROGRaFÍA Y ANÁLISIS MULTI-MÉTODO DE PROCEDENCIA DE LA FORMACIÓN GUINEALES, NORTE DE LA CORDILLERA OCCIDENTAL DE COLOMBIA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(~14 Ma). In this scenario, the youngest AHe age of 4.9 ± 0.6 Ma, which closely overlaps with the youngest AFT age population of 5.5 ± 2.6 Ma, is likely to represent the maximum accumulation age for the Guineales Fm., which is coherent with the previously suggested age < 9 Ma (Rodríguez et al, ). Nevertheless, further biostratigrpahic analysis and/or a larger amount of thermochronological ages will surely constrain more precisely the depositional age for the Guineales Fm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(~14 Ma). In this scenario, the youngest AHe age of 4.9 ± 0.6 Ma, which closely overlaps with the youngest AFT age population of 5.5 ± 2.6 Ma, is likely to represent the maximum accumulation age for the Guineales Fm., which is coherent with the previously suggested age < 9 Ma (Rodríguez et al, ). Nevertheless, further biostratigrpahic analysis and/or a larger amount of thermochronological ages will surely constrain more precisely the depositional age for the Guineales Fm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The detrital nonreset character of the obtained AFT ages the Guineales Fm. is supported by as follows: (1) individual ages are mostly older than the maximum depositional age of 9 Ma previously suggested (Rodríguez et al, ) and (2) because individual ages closely resemble the AFT ages yielded by the Penderisco and Cruces Fm., which are potential sources for this sedimentary unit as discussed above in the sedimentary provenance section. Although this reasoning is more complicated when exploring the significance of the AHe individual due to the limited amount of analyzed grains, we interpret that this unit shows nonreset detrital AHe ages from the nearby sources because (1) the AHe dispersion observed in sample DMT‐010 cannot be explained by e [ U ] and grain size and (2) like the AFT analysis, individual AHe ages resemble those cooling ages obtained for samples UDB‐063 from the Penderisco Fm (~5–9 Ma) and DMT‐003 from the Cruces Fm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations