2016
DOI: 10.5231/psy.writ.2016.1503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

¿Estrellas o constelaciones? Implicaciones de los estudios cognitivos para el modelo dimensional de la emoción

Abstract: Uno de los principales debates dentro del estudio de la psicología de la emoción concierne a la concepción de las emociones como constructos psicológicos unificados (categoriales/discretos) en contraposición con el enfoque dimensional del episodio emocional. En este marco, el modelo dimensional de Russell (2003) destaca en el panorama académico al constituir una propuesta integradora que da cuenta de una serie de problemas históricos del ámbito de estudio. Con este fin, se realiza una aproximación analítica a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent decades, the dedication of researchers and academics to the study of the relationships between emotion and cognition has highlighted the ubiquitous role of emotion in human cognition and behavior, whether at the perceptual and attentional levels [ 35 , 36 ], in relation to memory [ 37 ], or in reasoning and decision-making [ 38 , 39 ]. At the neural level, it seems increasingly clear that emotional and cognitive processes cannot be separated, given the interaction between the neural bases of each, which situates them as non-modular elements [ 40 , 41 , 42 ], or as dimensions of a whole.…”
Section: Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent decades, the dedication of researchers and academics to the study of the relationships between emotion and cognition has highlighted the ubiquitous role of emotion in human cognition and behavior, whether at the perceptual and attentional levels [ 35 , 36 ], in relation to memory [ 37 ], or in reasoning and decision-making [ 38 , 39 ]. At the neural level, it seems increasingly clear that emotional and cognitive processes cannot be separated, given the interaction between the neural bases of each, which situates them as non-modular elements [ 40 , 41 , 42 ], or as dimensions of a whole.…”
Section: Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core-affect theory [ 43 ] assumes the existence of: (a) an affective or neurophysiological state that occurs as a result of the combination of hedonic values (pleasure–displeasure) and arousal (activation–relaxation), that is experienced in the body and that precedes and interacts with other components, these being: (b) attribution to the stimulus that gives rise to it (the core-affect is perceived as a response to a trigger, object, or event that arouses it and that possesses an implicit affective quality); (c) appraisal (the subjective assessment that the person makes of said stimulus); (d) tendency to action (predisposition to respond based on said subjective assessment); (e) somatic, facial, and/or vocal changes (physiological manifestations of the emotional state that the person experiences); and (f) subjective experience (also understood as emotional meta-experience, or categorization/attribution of meaning to the emotional episode that results from the prior elements). The first two elements (core-affect and appraisal) trigger all emotional processing [ 41 ]. The first element is nonspecific and internal (identified with sensations or physiological changes experienced by the body) and can be attributed to a cause (an external or internal stimulus that provokes it).…”
Section: Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 99%