Objective-To assess long-term fracture risk following hysterectomy, with or without oophorectomy.Design-Population-based cohort study.
Setting-Olmsted County, Minnesota.
Patients-9258Olmsted County women who underwent hysterectomy in 1965-2002 compared to an equal number of age-and sex-matched community controls.Interventions-Observational study of the effect of hysterectomy for various indications on subsequent fractures.Main outcome measures-Fractures of any type, and at osteoporotic sites (e.g., hip, spine, and wrist) alone, as assessed by electronic review of inpatient and outpatient diagnoses in the community.Results-Compared to controls, there was a significant increase (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.13-1.29) in overall fracture risk among the women with hysterectomy, but osteoporotic fracture risk was not elevated (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.98-1.22). Most hysterectomy indications were associated with fractures generally, albeit often not statistically significantly, but only operations for uterine prolapse were associated with osteoporotic fractures (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.01-1.74). Oophorectomy was not an independent predictor of fracture risk (HR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.98-1.15).Conclusions-Hysterectomy does not appear to pose much long-term risk for fractures, but the association of fractures with surgery for uterine prolapse deserves further attention.