1982
DOI: 10.1016/0039-128x(82)90124-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estrogen sulfurylation as an alternative indicator of hormone dependence in human breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Raju et al (1980) indicated that ST activity tended to be lower in ER-negative tumours compared with those that contained the receptor. Other laboratories have suggested that ST activity could be used as an alternative indicator of likely response to endocrine therapy (Pewnim et al 1982, Tseng et al 1983, Adams et al 1989. A single study on the detection of ST protein in breast tumours using immunocyto¬ chemical methods has been published to date.…”
Section: St Functionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, Raju et al (1980) indicated that ST activity tended to be lower in ER-negative tumours compared with those that contained the receptor. Other laboratories have suggested that ST activity could be used as an alternative indicator of likely response to endocrine therapy (Pewnim et al 1982, Tseng et al 1983, Adams et al 1989. A single study on the detection of ST protein in breast tumours using immunocyto¬ chemical methods has been published to date.…”
Section: St Functionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is interesting to mention that some groups report a positive correlation between the expression of SULT1E1 and that of ER in human breast cancer cell lines and tumors. Patients whose tumors presented no SULT activity failed to respond to adrenalectomy and had a poor prognosis 33,35 …”
Section: Sult Expression and Its Control In Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients whose tumors presented no SULT activity failed to respond to adrenalectomy and had a poor prognosis. 33,35 A study on the effects of the progestin promegestone (R-5020) on hEST1 (now named SULT1A3 mRNA) and the formation of estrogen sulfates in the T-47D and MCF-7 cells showed that at low doses of R-5020 there was a significant increase of mRNA levels in these breast cancer cell lines. This was accompanied by an increased formation of estrogen sulfates in these cell lines following the treatment.…”
Section: Sult Expression and Its Control In Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finding of a significantly greater proportion of 3H-oestradiol in breast tumours compared with normal tissues after 'H-oestrone infusion suggests that conversion of oestrone to oestradiol is enhanced in tumour tissue. It is likely that oestrone will also be in equilibrium with oestrone sulphate within these tissues as both sulpho-transferase and -kinase enzymes are present in breast tissues (Penwim et al, 1982). This may account for the relatively greater proportion of 'Hoestrone seen in tumour and normal breast tissues after 'H-oestrone infusion.…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%