The physical and immunological properties of the estrogen-induced protein from rat uterus are compared with those of ovalbumin from chick oviduct. Both proteins are induced by estrogen and are under estrogenic regulation. Electrophoretic mobility on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels and elution behavior on Sephadex G-100 column chromatography indicate that the uterine protein has a molecular weight of about 42,000, similar to that of ovalbumin, and likewise is composed of only one subunit. On isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide gels, both proteins focus at a pH of 4.6.The uterine protein, in addition, shows a component with an isoelectric point of 5.1. Despite considerable similarity in the physical properties of the uterine protein and ovalbumin, there is no significant crossreactivity of antiovalbumin gamma globulin with the uterine protein, implying that these two estrogen-regulated proteins are immunologically distinct.The induction of the synthesis of a specific uterine protein called "induced protein" (IP) is the earliest known biosynthetic tissue response after estrogen binding. IP synthesis, which is detectable by 40 min (1), is preceded by synthesis of RNA required for IP synthesis [detectable by 10 min (2) 1; this synthesis can be induced by physiological concentrations of estrogens in vitro (3-6) and can be inhibited by some anti-estrogens (7). However, the function of IP is unknown and little has been reported about its physical properties.The similarity we observed in the migration of IP and ovalbumin in several gel electrophoretic and protein separation procedures was intriguing because ovalbumin, from chick oviduct, is also a protein whose synthesis is induced by estrogen (8,9). If IP and ovalbumin were closely related, it might be suggestive of the function of IP and have evolutionary implications. We, therefore, compared the physical and immunological properties of IP and ovalbumin.This report shows that IP and ovalbumin have similar electrophoretic properties on polyacrylamide gels and have nearly identical molecular weights and similar isoelectric points as judged by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, Sephadex column chromatography, and isoelectric focusing. However, despite considerable similarity in their physical properties, the two proteins show no significant immunological crossreactivity, as monitored by immunoprecipitation techniques. (5).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
IncubationPolyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis. Uterine supernatant fractions were separated on 6% polyacrylamide gels (9 X 0.7 cm) that were prepared and run in TBE buffer (66 mM Tris-20 mM boric acid-3 mM Na2 EDTA, pH 8.6 at 250) and processed as described (5). SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis. Samples were run on 10% polyacrylamide-0.1% SDS, pH 7.2 gels (9 cm X 0.7 cm) by the method of Weber and Osborn (10). For preparation of the IP sample, gel slices are cut from TBEpolyacrylamide gels and mashed into small pieces. The proteins in the gel fragments from two (2.3 mm) gel ...