2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018jc014646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estuarine Dissolved Organic Carbon Flux From Space: With Application to Chesapeake and Delaware Bays

Abstract: This study uses a neural network model trained with in situ data, combined with satellite data and hydrodynamic model products, to compute the daily estuarine export of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) at the mouths of Chesapeake Bay (CB) and Delaware Bay (DB) from 2007 to 2011. Both bays show large flux variability with highest fluxes in spring and lowest in fall as well as interannual flux variability (0.18 and 0.27 Tg C/year in 2008 and 2010 for CB; 0.04 and 0.09 Tg C/year in 2008 and 2011 for DB). Based on p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our estimated retrieval uncertainty for DOC is within the range of remote sensing uncertainties reported from matchups for coastal waters off northeast America (±11 to 36 μmol liter −1 ) ( 82 ), while the uncertainties for our high-concentration stations (±100 to 240 μmol liter −1 ; fig. S14) are similar to the uncertainties reported from matchups for a DOC-rich marsh estuary in the Gulf of Mexico (±150 to 190 μmol liter −1 ) ( 83 ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Our estimated retrieval uncertainty for DOC is within the range of remote sensing uncertainties reported from matchups for coastal waters off northeast America (±11 to 36 μmol liter −1 ) ( 82 ), while the uncertainties for our high-concentration stations (±100 to 240 μmol liter −1 ; fig. S14) are similar to the uncertainties reported from matchups for a DOC-rich marsh estuary in the Gulf of Mexico (±150 to 190 μmol liter −1 ) ( 83 ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The most common way to distinguish marine from terrigenous CDOM is by measuring the slope of the CDOM absorption spectrum, originally over large wavelength ranges from UV to visible bands (Stedmon & Markager 2001, Kowalczuk et al 2006, Astoreca et al 2009). More recently, spectral slopes over narrow ranges of shorter wavelengths have become increasingly established for identifying terrigenous CDOM in terrestrially influenced waters, especially the spectral slope (S) between 275 and 295 nm, S 275−295 (Helms et al 2008, Vantrepotte et al 2015, Lu et al 2016, Medeiros et al 2017, Carr et al 2019, Signorini et al 2019. S 275−295 has also been used successfully to quantify tDOC concentrations in shelf seas (Fichot & Benner 2012, Fichot et al 2013.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common way to distinguish marine from terrigenous CDOM is by measuring the slope of the CDOM absorption spectrum, originally over large wavelength ranges from UV to visible (Stedmon & Markager 2001, Kowalczuk et al 2006, Astoreca et al 2009). More recently, spectral slopes over narrow ranges of shorter wavelengths have become increasingly established for identifying terrigenous CDOM in terrestrially influenced marine waters, especially the spectral slope between 275-295 nm, S275-295 (Helms et al 2008, Vantrepotte et al 2015, Lu et al 2016, Medeiros et al 2017, Carr et al 2019, Signorini et al 2019. S275-295 has also been used successfully to quantify tDOC concentrations in shelf seas (Fichot & Benner 2012, Fichot et al 2013, Fichot et al 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%