2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.rh.2010.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estudio de la eficacia y fiabilidad de un sistema de posturografía en comparación con la escala de Berg

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, the correlations indexes (CCI) are higher than 0.70, which is the lower limit to be considered reliable. Furthermore, there are several parameters with a CCI higher than 0.80 which indicates a very reliable correlation (Baydal-Bertomeu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In most cases, the correlations indexes (CCI) are higher than 0.70, which is the lower limit to be considered reliable. Furthermore, there are several parameters with a CCI higher than 0.80 which indicates a very reliable correlation (Baydal-Bertomeu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Each test was performed three times during 30 s and the mean average balance values were calculated for its analysis. The sampling rate of the system was set at 40 Hz according to the manufacturer’s recommendations [ 21 ]. A trial was discarded and repeated if participants removed the feet from the platform before finishing the test or were completely unable to maintain balance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spain) [16]. Participants were asked to seek the position of greatest stability whilst standing barefoot with their arms relaxed by their side and feet positioned so that the heels were touching and the toes were diverging at an angle of 30ᵒ.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…more sensitive assessment methods such as a force plate rather than tests and clinical scales could have helped in the observation of these differences between the groups [16,39]. Moreover, FPCA, which deals with participants' patterns of recovery and not with specific values at determined temporal assessments, provided us with a useful approach to establish differences between both PT protocols [5].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%