Estudio Octabaix. Sumario de la valoración inicial y 5 años de seguimiento

Ferrer, Assumpta; Formiga, Francesç; Padrós, Glòria; Badía, Toni; Almeda, Jesús; Octabaix, Grupo estudio

doi:10.1016/j.regg.2016.03.002

Cited by 10 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Notably, within the successful aging group, 4.7% were frail and 55% were pre-frail. After 5 years, the mortality rate was high (42.1%), and survivors had significantly greater functional independence and fewer comorbidities [44].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Successful Aging and Frailty: A Systematic Review

Rolfson

2018

Geriatrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The terms successful aging (SA) and frailty appear to have much in common, both in terms of overlapping constructs and common challenges with consensus and operationalization. The aim of this review is to summarize existing literature that defines that relationship. Primary and secondary source articles that used either term in the title or abstract were systematically reviewed for relevance to the study objective. Of 61 articles that met these criteria, 30 were secondary source, and of these four were highly relevant. Four of the remaining 31 original research articles were selected, and the prevalence of frailty and SA in populations with different characteristics were described and compared. The same model of frailty was used in all primary studies, but definitions for successful aging were heterogeneous. The prevalence of frailty ranged from 11.8% to 44.0% and that of SA ranged from 10.4% to 47.2%. The definitions used for each, especially the extent of multidimensionality, appeared to reflect the degree of overlap between SA and frailty. Whether frailty and SA are part of the same or different constructs, there is a pressing need for an ordered taxonomy to advance research that translates into clinical practice.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Successful Aging and Frailty: A Systematic Review

Rolfson

2018

Geriatrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Cruz-Jentoft habla de insuficiencia terminal de órgano (264).3.-CLASIFICACIÓNEn algunos casos la sarcopenia puede ser solo por el envejecimiento sin identificarse otras causas, sin embargo, en ocasiones existen procesos de base como son enfermedades sistémicas, bien neoplasias, enfermedades terminales de órgano, que pueden explicarla o trastornos nutricionales como inadecuada ingesta o malabsorción que justificarían la pérdida muscular (sarcopenia primaria o secundaria).3.3.2.-Fragilidad: como hemos comentado previamente, la fragilidad es un síndrome geriátrico que se caracteriza por el declive de múltiples órganos y funciones del organismo y en cuya patogénesis influyen factores físicos, psíquicos y sociales. Y que aumenta la vulnerabilidad a sufrir discapacidad, ingresos hospitalarios y muerte.La sarcopenia contribuye al desarrollo del síndrome de fragilidad, aunque éste incluye muchos más aspectos(114)(115)(116)(117)(118)(119)(120)(121)(122)(123)(124)(125)(126)(127)(128)(129).3.3.3.-Malnutrición asociada a sarcopenia: Una de las causas de sarcopenia podría ser la inadecuada ingesta de proteínas. Existen estudios que demuestran que los pacientes hospitalizados en Traumatología ingieren insuficientes proteínas, energía y micronutrientes, ya que el reposo, la situación hipermetabólica por la inflamación y la pérdida de apetito influyen en ello.…”

unclassified