2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nrl.2011.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estudios normativos españoles en población adulta joven (Proyecto NEURONORMA jóvenes): normas para las pruebas span verbal, span visuoespacial, Letter-Number Sequencing, Trail Making Test y Symbol Digit Modalities Test

Abstract: The data obtained will be useful in the clinical evaluation of young Spanish adults.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
2
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
30
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Each cognitive domain included a minimum of two tests: (1) memory was assessed with the Verbal Learning Spanish–Complutense Test (TAVEC) [52] and Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) [53]–[55]; (2) working memory was tested with the Digit Span subtest (backward) [29], [56], [57] and Corsi's Block-Tapping test (backward) [56], [57]; (3) attention was evaluated with the Digit Span subtest (forward) [29], [56], [57], Corsi's Block-Tapping test (forward) [56], [57] and the Stroop test [58]–[60]; (4) executive functions were assessed with the FAS test and Animals [61]–[63] and the Matrix Reasoning subtest [29]; (5) visuoconstruction and visuoperception were tested with the Block Design subtest [29] and the copy of ROCF [53]–[55]; and (6) processing speed (seconds) was evaluated with the copy of ROCF and the Trail Making Test (parts A and B) [53]–[57]. In addition, the Vocabulary subtest was applied to obtain an IQ score [29].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each cognitive domain included a minimum of two tests: (1) memory was assessed with the Verbal Learning Spanish–Complutense Test (TAVEC) [52] and Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) [53]–[55]; (2) working memory was tested with the Digit Span subtest (backward) [29], [56], [57] and Corsi's Block-Tapping test (backward) [56], [57]; (3) attention was evaluated with the Digit Span subtest (forward) [29], [56], [57], Corsi's Block-Tapping test (forward) [56], [57] and the Stroop test [58]–[60]; (4) executive functions were assessed with the FAS test and Animals [61]–[63] and the Matrix Reasoning subtest [29]; (5) visuoconstruction and visuoperception were tested with the Block Design subtest [29] and the copy of ROCF [53]–[55]; and (6) processing speed (seconds) was evaluated with the copy of ROCF and the Trail Making Test (parts A and B) [53]–[57]. In addition, the Vocabulary subtest was applied to obtain an IQ score [29].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the TMT is one of the most widely used tests in Latin America (ArangoLasprilla et al, 2016) and Spain (Olabarrieta-Landa et al, 2016). Thus, there are norms for adult populations in Latin America (Arango-Lasprilla et al, 2015;Méndez-Ramírez et al, 2015) and Spain (Peña-Casanova et al, 2009;Tamayo et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rest of the neuropsychological tasks were categorized into three cognitive domains: memory, working memory and attention. The memory tasks were divided into verbal material: TAVEC (trials 1-5, short-term and long-term memory, and recognition) (Benedet & Alejandre, 1998); and non-verbal material: Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF; short-term and long-term memory) (Rey, 2009); the Digit Span subtest (backward) (Wechsler, 2004) and Corsi's Block-Tapping test (backward) (Tamayo et al, 2012) were used to estimate working memory. In relation to attention, the Digit Span subtest (forward) (Wechsler, 2004), Corsi's Block-Tapping (forward) and the Stroop test (Golden, 2010) were administered.…”
Section: Neuropsychological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%