2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0066-782x2006000300012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estudo comparativo entre a pressão positiva intermitente (Reanimador de Müller) e contínua no pós-operatório de cirurgia de revascularização do miocárdio

Abstract: OBJECTIVETo compare the effect of the use of intermittent and continuous positive airway pressure in postoperative patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODSThis study included forty patients divided into two groups: one undergoing continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP Group), and the other undergoing intermittent pressure (Müller Resuscitator Group). The patients were evaluated in relation to the several study variables at the following time points: preoperative, 3rd, 24th, and 48th hour… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
13

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
21
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Positive effects were observed with the use of NIV, including improvements in BIPP [25,27], BIPP associated with PEP [30], CPAP [24][25][26] and BiPAP [24,26] in the first days after HS, when the breathing is characterized by low tidal volume, offset by increased respiratory rate [24]. The adoption of this pattern of breathing tends to favor the development and continuity of atelectasis and changes in gas exchange [25,26]. Compared to CPAP [25] and IS [27], BIPP was considered more effective in increasing tidal volume, providing pulmonary re-expansion with less ventilation function [25,27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Positive effects were observed with the use of NIV, including improvements in BIPP [25,27], BIPP associated with PEP [30], CPAP [24][25][26] and BiPAP [24,26] in the first days after HS, when the breathing is characterized by low tidal volume, offset by increased respiratory rate [24]. The adoption of this pattern of breathing tends to favor the development and continuity of atelectasis and changes in gas exchange [25,26]. Compared to CPAP [25] and IS [27], BIPP was considered more effective in increasing tidal volume, providing pulmonary re-expansion with less ventilation function [25,27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Among the studies included, incentive spirometry (IS) was performed in three of them [20,24,27], deep breathing exercises (DBE) were used in six [20,21,23,[28][29][30]; DBE associated with positive expiratory pressure (PEP) was used in four [21,22,28,29] and PEP associated with respiratory resistance (PEP-IR) was used in two [21.28]. Breathing with intermittent positive pressure (BIPP) was used in three studies [25,27,30]; continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was used in two [24 , 26], bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) was used in three studies [24][25][26]. Two clinical trials used a control group that didn't receive respiratory physiotherapy [22.23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations