2009
DOI: 10.1590/s1517-86922009000500017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estudos de validação: qual análise utilizar?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This adjustment of nutrients using energy is seen as a methodological strategy developed to correctly try to estimate parameters and try to control any eventual confusion effect caused by energy in validation 8,10 studies. The Reduction of coefficient values after the adjustment by energy is useful to other studies [27][28][29][30][31] , which may evidence the presence of systematic errors on sub-or-super account of food consumption 5,31. A large number of validation studies used the Pearson's or the Spearman's correlation coefficient when comparing the methods 9,[27][28][29][30][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] which turned results more difficult to be evaluated. In spite of the coefficient's attained values, the use of ICC was adopted for viewing the several publications which point to overestimates association when using Pearson's correlation in samples with great inter-subject variability, which as a consequence, could lead to false conclusions concerning the method's validity 23,41 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This adjustment of nutrients using energy is seen as a methodological strategy developed to correctly try to estimate parameters and try to control any eventual confusion effect caused by energy in validation 8,10 studies. The Reduction of coefficient values after the adjustment by energy is useful to other studies [27][28][29][30][31] , which may evidence the presence of systematic errors on sub-or-super account of food consumption 5,31. A large number of validation studies used the Pearson's or the Spearman's correlation coefficient when comparing the methods 9,[27][28][29][30][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] which turned results more difficult to be evaluated. In spite of the coefficient's attained values, the use of ICC was adopted for viewing the several publications which point to overestimates association when using Pearson's correlation in samples with great inter-subject variability, which as a consequence, could lead to false conclusions concerning the method's validity 23,41 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plot of agreement between the mean and the difference between the measures was generated, enabling the evaluation of the magnitude of the differences and the respective 95% Confidence Intervals [37].…”
Section: E T H O D Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Além disso, este método permite veri car a presença do viés de medida, ou seja, o quanto a diferença entre os resultados das medidas se distancia de zero. Essa técnica tem se mostrado altamente informativa e requer pouca so sticação nas rotinas computacionais 19 . …”
Section: Métodounclassified