1949
DOI: 10.1021/ie50479a036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethane Pyrolysis

Abstract: Ethane was cracked in a copper-lined, alloy steel tube at temperatures in the range 1700°to 1900°F. Hydrogen and ethylene were the principal products, under the experimental conditions, but acetylene and butadiene were also formed in appreciable amounts.The concentration of ethylene in the cracked gas increased with increased ethane cracking to a maximum value of 37% at 1800 ^F. and 83% destruction of ethane. INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY Vol. 41, No. 11Table I. Ethane Pyrolysis" Run No.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1950
1950
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In studies with n-hexadecane (Fabuss et aL, 1962) in a 3.2 mm inside diameter by 1.2 m long reactor, the average difference between the reacting gas and the wall temperature (593 0C) was estimated to be about 33 0C, when the uncorrected first order rate constant was 0.06 s. However, when the reaction rate was increased to 0.54 s by increasing the wall temperature to 704° C, the resulting difference between the gas and wail temperature was a substantial 94° C. Residence times varied between 0.25 and 10 s. On the other hand, in a 1 mm inside diameter tubular reactor with residence times of 1 minute, rate constants of up to 0.5 s were obtained with no significant temperature difference between the gas and wall (Sandier and Chung, 1961). The benefits of decreasing the reactor diameter even further were demonstrated b Hepp et al (1949). They were able to measure ethané.…”
Section: Flow Reactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies with n-hexadecane (Fabuss et aL, 1962) in a 3.2 mm inside diameter by 1.2 m long reactor, the average difference between the reacting gas and the wall temperature (593 0C) was estimated to be about 33 0C, when the uncorrected first order rate constant was 0.06 s. However, when the reaction rate was increased to 0.54 s by increasing the wall temperature to 704° C, the resulting difference between the gas and wail temperature was a substantial 94° C. Residence times varied between 0.25 and 10 s. On the other hand, in a 1 mm inside diameter tubular reactor with residence times of 1 minute, rate constants of up to 0.5 s were obtained with no significant temperature difference between the gas and wall (Sandier and Chung, 1961). The benefits of decreasing the reactor diameter even further were demonstrated b Hepp et al (1949). They were able to measure ethané.…”
Section: Flow Reactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Process temperatures can potentially be lowered to <500 °C and render the process inherently safe, since the ignition temperature of C 2 H 6 is ≈510 °C. [ 55 ] iii) Depending on the type of the OC and its thermodynamic properties, heat may be generated during the regeneration/oxidation step, which can be utilized within the process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 ( r A p / A ) vs. the experimental result. The molecules presented span a range of approximately 10 orders of magnitude in rate constant and chain lengths from approximately lo3 for dibenzylether (DBE) (LaMarca, 1992), 10' for ethane (Frey and Smith, 1928;Marek and McCluer, 1932;Hepp et al, 1949;Quinn, 1963;Pratt, 1966) and at most 0.1 for bibenzyl (BB) (Poutsma, 1980;Miller and Stein, 1981;Petrocelli and Klein, 1984;Petrocelli, 1985) and benzylphenylamine (BPA) (Abraham and Klein, 1985;Abraham, 1987). The strong correlation in Figure 2 shows the versatility of Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%